2017
DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2017.1328114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AWJ machinability performance of CS/UPR composites with the effect of chemical treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Untreated SP fiber with 1% BFA and CFA showed higher surface roughness when compared to treated SP fibers. Alkali treatment provides wet resistant and rough fiber which improves the compatibility between fiber/matrix and decreases the surface roughness in the natural hybrid composites [29]. Similarly untreated SP fiber with 3% BGFA showed higher surface roughness than treated fibers.…”
Section: Machining Properties Of Untreated Fibersmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Untreated SP fiber with 1% BFA and CFA showed higher surface roughness when compared to treated SP fibers. Alkali treatment provides wet resistant and rough fiber which improves the compatibility between fiber/matrix and decreases the surface roughness in the natural hybrid composites [29]. Similarly untreated SP fiber with 3% BGFA showed higher surface roughness than treated fibers.…”
Section: Machining Properties Of Untreated Fibersmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The higher filler addition at 4% BFA reduces the MRR due to agglomeration effect, which damages the matrix properties. Agglomeration reduced the load carrying and stress transfer capacity, which ultimately reduces the machining nature of the epoxy based composites [29]. Hybrid fiber composites with out filler showed brittle failure at higher WP and it also severely damage the fiber/matrix bonding [27].…”
Section: Machinability Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides, the existence of γ-GPS silane can obviously improves stability of the hydrolysate, but excessive content of absolute ethanol may inhibit the hydrolysis of γ-GPS silane, leading to the less formation of Si-OH groups in the hydrolysate, and this will be detrimental for the adhesion to organic epoxy coating [8]. 1.2-bis(trimethoxysilyl)ethane (BTSE) belongs to hydrophobic silane, and it is insoluble in water, and needs to be hydrolyzed in the presence of a large amount of absolute ethanol [9]. Studies show that the hydrolysis rate of BTSE silane is very slow in pure absolute ethanol solvent [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%