2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2010.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axial dispersion of granular material in horizontal rotating cylinders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

7
40
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 but is consistent with the fractional diffusion equation governing a subdiffusive process with hðΔzÞ 2 i 1∕2 ∝ t 0.3 (12). Subsequent numerical simulations of the axial diffusion of granular materials through particle dynamics using the discrete element method (DEM) (32)(33)(34) found that the mean squared displacement of individual particles grows (asymptotically) linearly with time, consistent with normal (Fickian) diffusion; i.e., hðΔzÞ 2 i ∝ t. X-ray measurements of individual particle trajectories in the most recent experiments (23) are in agreement with the simulations. Thus, there is a clear paradox between the microscopic and macroscopic theories of axial diffusion of granular materials.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…1 but is consistent with the fractional diffusion equation governing a subdiffusive process with hðΔzÞ 2 i 1∕2 ∝ t 0.3 (12). Subsequent numerical simulations of the axial diffusion of granular materials through particle dynamics using the discrete element method (DEM) (32)(33)(34) found that the mean squared displacement of individual particles grows (asymptotically) linearly with time, consistent with normal (Fickian) diffusion; i.e., hðΔzÞ 2 i ∝ t. X-ray measurements of individual particle trajectories in the most recent experiments (23) are in agreement with the simulations. Thus, there is a clear paradox between the microscopic and macroscopic theories of axial diffusion of granular materials.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…However, neither Parker et al [9] nor Third et al [10] were able to provide an explanation of why D ax is independent of D. Furthermore, for large values of D the particle motion within the bed will move from the rolling regime observed at low Fr to the cataracting or centrifuging regimes. Therefore, although it has never been reported, it is expected that there is an upper limit for D above which the observation that D ax is independent of D will fail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Both Parker et al [9] and Third et al [10] found the rate of axial dispersion to be independent of the drum diameter (D) for sufficiently large values of D. This result is particularly intriguing since it implies that the rotational Froude number (Fr = 2 D/2g), which is often used to characterize particle motion within rotating cylinders [11,12], does not govern axial * jthird@ethz.ch dispersion within these systems. However, neither Parker et al [9] nor Third et al [10] were able to provide an explanation of why D ax is independent of D. Furthermore, for large values of D the particle motion within the bed will move from the rolling regime observed at low Fr to the cataracting or centrifuging regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An appropriate environment for microbial growth includes sufficient dissolved oxygen, rapid carbon dioxide discharge [3], and low or suitable intensity of shear force [4]. Rotating-drum equipment is commonly used in the process industry for drying and mixing of solid particles and materials [5][6][7][8]. Due to the mild shear force it can provide, the application of a rotating-drum bioreactor (RDB) has been explored in shear-sensitive bioprocesses, e.g., plant cell culture [9,10], solid substrate fermentation [11][12][13], composting [14], bioremediation [6,15,16], and bioleaching processes [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%