2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2006.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axial flow over a blunt circular cylinder with and without shear layer reattachment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, the model support should not cause aerodynamic interference (e.g., magneticforce supports 34 ), but the most predominant supports involve sting mounts that are directly in the body's wake. An alternative support, aimed at minimizing the wake-support interference, was utilized by Abramson et al 22,23 and Lambert et al 24 , where a model is supported by thin wires.…”
Section: Technical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the model support should not cause aerodynamic interference (e.g., magneticforce supports 34 ), but the most predominant supports involve sting mounts that are directly in the body's wake. An alternative support, aimed at minimizing the wake-support interference, was utilized by Abramson et al 22,23 and Lambert et al 24 , where a model is supported by thin wires.…”
Section: Technical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The miniature robotic fish has a similar coefficient of drag to that of a sphere (Morrison 2013), ranging between 1.04 and 0.39, for Reynolds number varying from 10 2 to 10 4 . For a cylinder in axial water flow (Higuchi et al 2006) with similar dimensions, but in a higher range of Reynolds number from 6 9 10 4 to 1.8 9 10 5 , the coefficient of drag is *0.84, and is expected to decrease in the presence of a streamlined nose and lower Reynolds number (Hoerner 1965).…”
Section: Estimation Of the Coefficient Of Dragmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the model support should not cause aerodynamic interference (e.g., magnetic-force supports Higuchi et al 1996), but the predominant supports involve sting mounts that are directly in the body's wake. An alternative support, aimed at minimizing the wake-support interference, was utilized by Abramson et al (2011, where a model is supported by thin static wires.…”
Section: Technical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%