1992
DOI: 10.1139/t92-002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axial load transfer for piles in sand. I. Tests on an instrumented precast pile

Abstract: A precast concrete pile was driven 11.0 m into a sand deposit and subjected to three compression and one tension static loading tests. By means of strain-gage instrumentation, the loads imposed in the pile during the tests were determined. The observed load distributions appeared to suggest the existence of a critical depth. However, when the load data were supplemented with the residual load acting before the start of the tests, the appearance of critical depth disappeared. Instead, the analysis of the tests … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it is also difficult to obtain results from field tests. Accurate investigation of a real pile behaviour would require the application of instrumented piles [37,38], deeper analysis of contact effects on the pile surface [39] or model piles in calibration chambers on a geotechnical centrifuge [40][41][42]. It is clear that some recent developments of Material Point Method (MPM) [43] and Particle Finite Element Method (PFEM) [44] offer more sophisticated solutions, but the presented idea seems to be relatively easy to calibrate using SLT or pile driving reports (for precast driven piles).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is also difficult to obtain results from field tests. Accurate investigation of a real pile behaviour would require the application of instrumented piles [37,38], deeper analysis of contact effects on the pile surface [39] or model piles in calibration chambers on a geotechnical centrifuge [40][41][42]. It is clear that some recent developments of Material Point Method (MPM) [43] and Particle Finite Element Method (PFEM) [44] offer more sophisticated solutions, but the presented idea seems to be relatively easy to calibrate using SLT or pile driving reports (for precast driven piles).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data dikumpulkan dari beberapa literatur yaitu Albiero et al (1995), Altaee et al (1992), Avasarala et al (1994), Gambini (1985), Haustorfer & Plesiotis (1988), Hill (1987), Horvitz et al (1981), Laier (1994), Mayne & Harris (1993), Nevels & Snethen (1994), Niazi & Mayne (2010), O'Neill (1986), Reese et al (1988), Robertson et al (1988), Shackelford (1995), Tucker & Briaud (1988), Tumay & Fakhroo (1981), Viergever (1982), Weber (1987), Yen et al (1989, Ebrahimian (2011) dalam Ebrahimian & Movahed (2017) serta data dari Alsamman (1995) dan Eslami & Fellenius (1997) dalam I. Alkroosh & Nikraz (2011).…”
Section: Metode Pengumpulan Dataunclassified
“…The cases were obtained from 16 sources [32,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] reporting data from 18 sites in 10 countries. A summary of the case information is presented in Table 2 including reference, site location, pile characteristics, pile loading test results, and soil profiles.…”
Section: Case Records Databasementioning
confidence: 99%