2013
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axillary Lymph Node Biopsy in Newly Diagnosed Invasive Breast Cancer: Comparative Accuracy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy versus Core-Needle Biopsy

Abstract: When accurate preoperative staging of the axilla is needed in patients with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer, CNB is more sensitive than FNAB.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both FNA and core biopsy have been described [14, 28]. Core biopsy obtains a better tissue sample, but the presence of large vessels and delicate nerve plexus increases the risk for complications [28]. Rautiainen et al [28] recommend routine use of core biopsy over FNA and considered it a safe procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both FNA and core biopsy have been described [14, 28]. Core biopsy obtains a better tissue sample, but the presence of large vessels and delicate nerve plexus increases the risk for complications [28]. Rautiainen et al [28] recommend routine use of core biopsy over FNA and considered it a safe procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fine needle aspiration (FNA) or core needle biopsy, guided by ultrasound, should be performed on any suspicious appearing lymph nodes, although core needle biopsy is preferred when feasible due to greater accuracy. 13 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 summarizes the advantages of the combined procedure. Therefore, and as shown by other investigators, the utilization of both aspirate smears and core tissue biopsy material are complementary and have added value compared to either one alone [7,13,26,29,33,35,38,39,44,45,46,47,50,51,52,57,58,59,60,61,62,68,75,76,77,78]. …”
Section: Advantages Of the Combined Approachmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Although it is well known when evaluating mammary carcinoma that the axillary node status is best tackled by aspirate smears, FNAB alone in many cases cannot confirm that. Moreover, FNAB alone cannot confirm the presence of tumor invasion and cannot be used to differentiate between invasive and in situ neoplasia [29,30,31]. In addition, low-grade breast lesions, such as atypical ductal hyperplasia, low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ and tubular carcinoma, cannot be accurately diagnosed using this modality alone [32,33,34,35].…”
Section: Limitations Of Fnabmentioning
confidence: 99%