2021
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd8637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axodendritic versus axosomatic cochlear efferent termination is determined by afferent type in a hierarchical logic of circuit formation

Abstract: Hearing involves a stereotyped neural network communicating cochlea and brain. How this sensorineural circuit assembles is largely unknown. The cochlea houses two types of mechanosensory hair cells differing in function (sound transmission versus amplification) and location (inner versus outer compartments). Inner (IHCs) and outer hair cells (OHCs) are each innervated by a distinct pair of afferent and efferent neurons: IHCs are contacted by type I afferents receiving axodendritic efferent contacts; OHCs are c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7c ). This indicates that the proper formation of the tunnel of Corti is susceptible to the locally restricted loss of IHCs but that conversion of hair cells is not sufficient to induce the conversion of the underlying supporting cells as previously reported 42 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…7c ). This indicates that the proper formation of the tunnel of Corti is susceptible to the locally restricted loss of IHCs but that conversion of hair cells is not sufficient to induce the conversion of the underlying supporting cells as previously reported 42 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, although in other systems instructive signalling from neurons to their peripheral target cells are known to be crucial for the development of the targeted cells 57 , both IHC and OHC have been shown to develop in the absence of innervation 58 , 59 , we therefore here only focused on the outgoing HC to SGN signalling as it is more likely to represent an actual signalling network. Moreover, while OHCs are known to interact with I-SGNs, mostly through repulsive signals 26 , 60 , 61 , IHC to II-SGN negative interactions are more unlikely to occur at E18.5 60 and were then discarded from the analysis. Also, we filtered ligand-receptor modules based on their expression level and on the number of cells expressing the specific interactors as to provide higher confidence of their biological relevance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not clear if the reduction was only limited to type II fibers or if type II and efferent fibers to OHCs were both affected. Most nerve fibers crossing the tunnel are efferent fibers from MOC ( Maison et al, 2016 ; Webber et al, 2021 ). We did not label these fibers using specific markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%