Azerbaijan�s gas supply squeeze and the consequences for the Southern Corridor

Pirani, Simon

doi:10.26889/9781784670627

Cited by 21 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The Ukrainian entry/exit tariffs are from Interfax (2015). 9 Transport costs for the SGC, for the South Caspian Pipeline (SCP), for the TANAP and for the TAP are based on a detailed analysis by Pirani (2016). A distance-based approach is applied to derive transport costs, entry/exit fees and transit fees for other non-European world regions for which no detailed cost data is available.…”

Section: Productionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Besides the EU, Azerbaijan could solely sell its gas to Georgia or Turkey. However, the Turkish and Georgian demand for Azerbaijani gas is relatively small and accounted for only 8 bcm in 2015 (Pirani, 2016). Looking into the past, Azerbaijan delivered up to 2 bcm of gas to Russia in 2012 (Pirani, 2016).…”

Section: D2 Caspian Gas Via Russia In the Oligopolistic Setupmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, the Turkish and Georgian demand for Azerbaijani gas is relatively small and accounted for only 8 bcm in 2015 (Pirani, 2016). Looking into the past, Azerbaijan delivered up to 2 bcm of gas to Russia in 2012 (Pirani, 2016). Since then supplies have declined to zero in 2015.…”

Section: D2 Caspian Gas Via Russia In the Oligopolistic Setupmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Natural Gas Transits and Market Power: The Case of Turkey

Schulte¹,

Weiser²

2019

The Energy Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Turkey is a key country in order to realize the Southern Gas Corridor (SGC) due to its geographical location. However, as the main transit country within the SGC, Turkey could potentially exert market power with gas transits. Whether Turkey exerts market power or not, is crucial for an economic assessment of the SGC. Hence, the article investigates this issue quantitatively using a global partial equilibrium gas market model. An oligopolistic and a competitive supply structure in Europe in 2030 are considered in the model. If the European gas market in 2030 is characterized by an oligopolistic supply, Turkey is able to exert market power resulting in higher prices compared to competitive transits, in particular in South Eastern Europe. In a competitive market structure, however, the importance of the SGC and thus the potential of Turkish transit market power is limited.

show abstract

Section: Productionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: D2 Caspian Gas Via Russia In the Oligopolistic Setupmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Natural Gas Transits and Market Power: The Case of Turkey

Schulte¹,

Weiser²

2019

The Energy Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Pengakuan keperawatan sebagai perkembangan pengetahuan secara empiris tertuang dalam Notes of Nursing (Nightingale, 1992). Nightingale menjelaskan jika keperawatan merupakan seni dan ilmu yang menunjukkan bahwa praktik keperawatan dilakukan berdasarkan pendidikan yang berdasarkan penelitian termutakhir dan logika secara umum (Pirani, 2016).…”

Section: Empirical Knowingunclassified

Pattern of Knowing Pada Teori Keperawatan Florence Nightingale

Akbar

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In 2016, Algerian exports to Europe rose by nearly 10% for reasons that are not easy to explain other than that the country may need additional short term funds. 46 Pirani (2016). 47 In 2015, the utilisation figure was 24%, Corbeau and Ledesma, eds.…”

Section: Availability Of Non-russian Gas Imports 44mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Future of Gas in Decarbonising European Energy Markets

Stern¹

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PrefaceThe future of gas in the energy mix is a topic of obvious interest to the Natural Gas Programme at OIES, but we believe that it is particularly relevant given that expectations about its role in Europe have been confounded over the past decade. The argument that gas is the cleanest fossil fuel and should at least displace coal in the energy mix, especially in the power sector, has had little if any traction with policy-makers in spite of the apparent boost to the fuel's prospects provided by the COP21 agreement in December. In fact over the past decade gas's share of the European energy mix has declined sharply in the face of a rise in renewable energy, while coal demand has remained remarkably robust.A number of factors have contributed to this outcome. A low coal price, combined with an ineffective carbon price, has undermined the economics of gas-fired power generation; the importance of the coal industry as an important source of employment in a number of key European countries has discouraged attempts to reduce demand for it; concerns over methane leakage in the gas chain, as well as the debate over the exploitation of shale gas using fracked wells, have raised environmental concerns; and finally security of supply issues have been raised due to the perception of an overdependence on Russian gas in the European market, in particular in light of the continuing crisis in Russia-Ukraine relations. Overall then, the potential benefits of gas as an energy source which can reduce short term CO2 emissions and complement the intermittency of wind and solar power have failed to gain acceptance from a variety of environmental, energy and political stakeholders.In this paper Jonathan Stern reviews in detail the problems which gas continues to face in Europe, and also highlights the potential impact on all parts of the gas value chain. Indeed he suggests that it is the fragmentation of the gas industry, and the different incentives within each sector, which is partly to blame for the lack of a coherent message from the industry as a whole. His conclusion is a radical one, namely that in order to have a long-term future the gas industry needs to develop a decarbonisation strategy. Furthermore, it needs to do it fast, because policy decisions made in the next few years will determine whether gas has a promising or declining outlook in Europe beyond 2030.The paper is deliberately Euro-centric, because this is the region where gas appears under greatest threat. Nevertheless, Stern acknowledges that different regions will have different outcomes, and it does appear, for example, that in Asia the potential for demand growth is significant. However, the European example can provide a salutary lesson concerning the mistakes that can be made by an industry that is convinced by a logic which fails to persuade a wider stakeholder community. The challenges in China and India, in particular the threat from cheap coal, are not so dissimilar, and the outlook for gas there remains uncertain.As a result, conclusions reached from...

show abstract

Azerbaijan�s gas supply squeeze and the consequences for the Southern Corridor

Cited by 21 publications

References 0 publications

Natural Gas Transits and Market Power: The Case of Turkey

Natural Gas Transits and Market Power: The Case of Turkey

Pattern of Knowing Pada Teori Keperawatan Florence Nightingale

The Future of Gas in Decarbonising European Energy Markets

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About