2019
DOI: 10.36038/2307-3497-2019-178-84-103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Azov roach as an indicator of pollution of the ecosystem of the Sea of Azov

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary efflux was the surface gas evasion (11,932.9 kg/yr), while the discharge in the Black Sea and sediment burial were 369.6 kg/yr and 473.0 kg/yr, respectively. While the water and sediment concentrations underestimated empirically measured offshore concentrations ( Table 1 ), they were comparable to the most recent average concentrations reported by Korablina et al [ 4 ] and Kuznetsov et al [ 5 ], respectively. The computed atmospheric Hg concentration of 6.0 ng/m 3 ( Figure 2 ) matched average concentrations reported for remote areas on the European continent [ 50 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The primary efflux was the surface gas evasion (11,932.9 kg/yr), while the discharge in the Black Sea and sediment burial were 369.6 kg/yr and 473.0 kg/yr, respectively. While the water and sediment concentrations underestimated empirically measured offshore concentrations ( Table 1 ), they were comparable to the most recent average concentrations reported by Korablina et al [ 4 ] and Kuznetsov et al [ 5 ], respectively. The computed atmospheric Hg concentration of 6.0 ng/m 3 ( Figure 2 ) matched average concentrations reported for remote areas on the European continent [ 50 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Due to the spatiotemporal variability in water temperature and wind speeds over the SoA, the precision of this estimation cannot be critically appraised; however, it provides evidence towards significant volatilisation in a large aquatic system.As documented in Table1, Hg concentrations in water and sediment are highly dependent on the sampling year and location. The values provided by Korablina et al[32] denote averages recorded between 1986 and 1992 and 1993 and 2005, respectively, which far exceed more recent concentrations (10 ng/L) reported for 2018 in offshore waters[4]. Using the method by Ethier et al[30], a residence time of 3.2 years for Hg loadings was computed, which underestimates the turnover reported byKorablina et al [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations