2017
DOI: 10.18637/jss.v081.i09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BANOVA: An R Package for Hierarchical Bayesian ANOVA

Abstract: In this paper, we develop generalized hierarchical Bayesian ANOVA, to assist experimental researchers in the behavioral and social sciences in the analysis of experiments with within-and between-subjects factors. The method alleviates several limitations of classical ANOVA, still commonly employed in those fields of research. An accompanying R Package for BANOVA is developed. It offers statistical routines and several easy-to-use functions for estimation of hierarchical Bayesian ANOVA models that are tailored … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The need to specify priors incorporating subjective information often hinders the recourse to Bayesian ANOVA by applied researchers (Rouder et al, 2012 ). For this reason, recently proposed software packages such as BANOVA and JASP implement default priors that can be overlooked by data analyzers that do not want to incorporate actual prior information (Dong and Wedel, 2017 ; Wagenmakers et al, 2018a ). Unfortunately, inference relying on the default priors considered by these packages (and on most of those in the literature) for the variance components can run into problems, when mixed models specified on the log of the response variable are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need to specify priors incorporating subjective information often hinders the recourse to Bayesian ANOVA by applied researchers (Rouder et al, 2012 ). For this reason, recently proposed software packages such as BANOVA and JASP implement default priors that can be overlooked by data analyzers that do not want to incorporate actual prior information (Dong and Wedel, 2017 ; Wagenmakers et al, 2018a ). Unfortunately, inference relying on the default priors considered by these packages (and on most of those in the literature) for the variance components can run into problems, when mixed models specified on the log of the response variable are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The descriptive statistic for the primary objective was presented by mean, standard deviation, and quantiles, whereas the secondary objective was presented by standard deviation, quantiles, and simple effect. Due to the limitations of standard repeated measures ANOVA for categorical variables and unbalanced data, the inductive statistics for the primary and secondary objectives as well as subgroup analysis were calculated using the Bayesian version of the repeated-measures analysis of variance (BANOVA) [127]. The p-values of the multiple comparisons were adjusted using the Bayesian model [128].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The posterior distribution of a function of the parameter b, say h(b), can be calculated by applying that function to each of the MCMC draws b (r) , that is, h(b (r) ), and it can be characterized via summary statistics of these draws h(b (r) ). As will be explained later, this property is very useful for computing simple effects, indirect effects in mediation models (Zhang et al, 2009), effect sizes (Dong & Wedel, 2017), and Johnson-Neyman points in floodlight analyses (Wedel & Dong, 2019).…”
Section: Posterior Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BANOVA framework and its companion software package builds on prior work by Dong and Wedel (2017) and Wedel and Dong (2019). It provides a flexible approach for analyzing data collected in experimental settings in which a sample of participants is exposed to between-subjects and/or within-subject manipulations, and in which continuous covariates or mediators may have been measured as well.…”
Section: The Banova Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%