1932
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.3750.915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B. Diphtheriae, Gravis and Mitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1933
1933
1947
1947

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only is type gravis not always associated with severe cases of diphtheria, nor type mitis with mild cases, but occasionally both types are isolated from patients or found in stock cultures. Parish, Whatley and O'Brien (1932) found that the mortality rate in human beings is about the same for organisMs of both colony forms and that, over a large region, the type gravis strains have been reported to be as prevalent in mild cases as in severe cases. Although the range in virulence of type mitis strains for guinea pigs was found by Anderson, et al, to be greater than that of type gravis strains, the latter showing more uniform virulence, only three of the 90 strains tested for virulence by these workers, (employing the intracutaneous method on guinea pigs), gave a very marked reaction and these were type mitis strains.…”
Section: Colony Formsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Not only is type gravis not always associated with severe cases of diphtheria, nor type mitis with mild cases, but occasionally both types are isolated from patients or found in stock cultures. Parish, Whatley and O'Brien (1932) found that the mortality rate in human beings is about the same for organisMs of both colony forms and that, over a large region, the type gravis strains have been reported to be as prevalent in mild cases as in severe cases. Although the range in virulence of type mitis strains for guinea pigs was found by Anderson, et al, to be greater than that of type gravis strains, the latter showing more uniform virulence, only three of the 90 strains tested for virulence by these workers, (employing the intracutaneous method on guinea pigs), gave a very marked reaction and these were type mitis strains.…”
Section: Colony Formsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To eliminate this possibility a technique was developed which did not require the use of diphtheria organisms or antitoxin, e.g., cultures of C. diphtheriae were replaced by sterile toxin. Since the identity of toxins from all strains of C. diphtheriae appears to have been demonstrated by Parish et al (1932), Povitsky et al (1933), Zinnemann and Zinnemann (1939), and Zinnemann (1946), the substitution of PW no. 8 toxin for that produced in vivo by other strains of C. diphtheriae (C1, C2, etc.)…”
Section: Use Of Toxin Instead Of C Diphtheriaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there are numerous areas in which the intermedius or the gravis form either is not present or is so scantily represented that it escapes observation. Such are: the Sudan (81), South Australia (146), Amsterdam and Rotterdam (165), Posen district of Poland (209), Huddersfield (119), and Helsingfors (120), which (151,202) No gravis (202) No gravis (129,151) (120) No information (100,127,147) All three strains found in all areas, but gravis markedly predominant in east and north-east and to a slight extent in other areas (8,20,22,62,64,68,75,76,78,90,122,132,141,144,155,170,185,190) Gravis predominant in Rotterdam, mitis in Amsterdam (165,177) No gravis detected (151) Gravis markedly predominant (35,40) All three types and atypical strains recorded (16,48,139, 152, 167, 184) Gravis predominant; intermedius absent except in Lem-berg (91, 161, 209, 215) Mitis predominant and gravis scanty in Moscow. Gravis predominant at Kharkov two years later (163,…”
Section: Stability In the Animal And Human Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TOXIN PRODUCTION BY THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF C. DIPHTHERIAE AND ON THE CONTROL BY STANDARD ANTITOXIN OF INFECTIONS WITH THESE TYPES Soon after the gravis type of the C. diphtheriae was described it was shown by Parish, et al (129,130) that by comparison with mitis strains and much more so Park No. 8, the gravis strains were poor toxin-producers in vitro and that infections by them were adequately controlled by standard antitoxin.…”
Section: T W Mcleodmentioning
confidence: 99%