2017
DOI: 10.1037/hop0000062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B. F. Skinner and technology’s nation: Technocracy, social engineering, and the good life in 20th-century America.

Abstract: Psychologist B. F. Skinner developed and promoted a technology of behavior as the basis for widespread social reform over much of his career. In 1948, he published his behaviorally engineered vision of the good life in his utopian novel Walden Two (Skinner, 1948). Skinner's efforts were part of a much larger social engineering tradition that received one of its fullest expressions in the Technocracy Movement of the 1930s. Fifteen years before Skinner's , at the height of the Technocracy Movement's public visib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A critical examination of the UK Industrial Strategy from a feminist and gender equity perspective has formed the narrative and viewpoints presented in this paper. This critical approach is situated within the wider sociological perspectives of scholars such as Zygmut Bauman and B.F.Skinner, who emphasise the significance of social needs and necessity of social action alongside institutionally driven, utopian technocracy (Varcoe, 1996;Rutherford, 2017). However, its true intention is to highlight amongst researchers and industry professionals alike, that the sizeable and welcome government investment in Construction 4.0 and its built results, in its current form, is not likely to improve equitable participation in the gender-troubled construction industry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical examination of the UK Industrial Strategy from a feminist and gender equity perspective has formed the narrative and viewpoints presented in this paper. This critical approach is situated within the wider sociological perspectives of scholars such as Zygmut Bauman and B.F.Skinner, who emphasise the significance of social needs and necessity of social action alongside institutionally driven, utopian technocracy (Varcoe, 1996;Rutherford, 2017). However, its true intention is to highlight amongst researchers and industry professionals alike, that the sizeable and welcome government investment in Construction 4.0 and its built results, in its current form, is not likely to improve equitable participation in the gender-troubled construction industry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skinner, grounded in experimental psychology, instead saw such appraisals of freedom as a misnomer, which prevented in-depth discussions about how the social might be ordered. In other words, if humanistic psychology showcases the predilection within the discipline of psychology to embrace individuality and the support of the full extent of such individuality, then the tradition of behaviorism aligns much more overtly with a style of "social engineering" (Rutherford, 2017), by which the individual's behavior was sought to be controlled, shaped, predicted and so forth. Freedom, in Skinner's radical behaviorism, melts into contingencies of reinforcement.…”
Section: Freedom As An Impossibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No entanto, o risco de aplicar essa teoria neste estudo é baseado no uso de várias tecnologias mencionadas anteriormente em sala de aula, as quais podem projetar e influenciar o comportamento humano, interpretando-o como uma nova filosofia da tecnologia. As aplicações apropriadas dessa teoria foram investigadas por Rutherford (2017). No contexto educacional, a teoria da dependência do aprendizado pode ser explorada como reforços positivos, sugerindo ações para prever notas baixas ou altas.…”
Section: Metodologiaunclassified