1996
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.1996.950653.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image‐EELS for in situ estimation of the phosphorus content of RNP granules

Abstract: Electron energy-loss spectroscopic imaging is performed on ultrathin sections, in order to approach the in-situ distribution of individual elements in the cellular constituents. In a previous ultrastructural study of salivary gland cells of Chironomus thummi and Ch. tentans by means of electron spectroscopic imaging and cytochemistry, we have described a new type of phosphorus-rich small granular ribonucleoprotein (RNP) component in the nucleoplasm of these cells; an attempt is made in the present work to esti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, decondensed chromatin and RNA fibrils cannot be differentiated from protein filaments of similar dimensions. Moreover, heavy atom contrast agents required in conventional electron microscopy frequently fail to stain some structures or overrepresent others, based on the degree of their chemical reactivity (Abholhassani-Dadras et al, 1996). The resolution of these components by ESI enables us to conclude that the majority of the fine structure found between "condensed" regions of chromatin comprises mainly protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, decondensed chromatin and RNA fibrils cannot be differentiated from protein filaments of similar dimensions. Moreover, heavy atom contrast agents required in conventional electron microscopy frequently fail to stain some structures or overrepresent others, based on the degree of their chemical reactivity (Abholhassani-Dadras et al, 1996). The resolution of these components by ESI enables us to conclude that the majority of the fine structure found between "condensed" regions of chromatin comprises mainly protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21][22] As shown in Figure 1, tens of energy-filtered images are recorded sequentially across a wide range of energy losses to construct a three-dimensional dataset containing spatial information, I(x, y), acquired in parallel, and spectral information, I(E), recorded in series. EELS spectra from arbitrarily selected regions in an image can be synthesized by calculating the average gray values of the same pixels in each energy-filtered image over the whole range of acquired images.…”
Section: Eftem Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The localization of chemically defined components in ultrathin sections of biological material has been a central subject of interest in structural biology for many years. In particular, the role of phosphorus as a position marker of nucleic acids is a topic that has deserved considerable effort (Ottensmeyer and Andrew, 1980;Bazett-Jones and Ottensmeyer, 1981;Adamson-Sharpe and Ottensmeyer, 1981;Korn et al, 1983;Ottensmeyer, 1984: Ottensmeyer et al, 1988;Rattner and Bazett-Jones, 1989;Heng et al, 1990;Ozel et al, 1990;Bazett-Jones, 1993: Harauz et al, 1995Abolhassani-Dadras et al, 1994, 1996Olins et al, 1996;Vazquez-Nin et al, 1996;Beniac et al, 1997a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique requires, however, long acquisition time (around 22 minutes for 32x64 pixel images (Shuman et al, 1986) or 20 minutes for 64x64 pixel images (Colliex et al, 1994). More recently, using a TEM equipped with an in-column spectrometer, it has been possible to obtain P-maps of nucleic acid-containing structures with a high SNR by applying the three-window method (Vazquez-Nin et al, 1996). Electron spectroscopic imaging of sectioned viruses has provided high-contrast imaging and an improvement of the resolution of the viral particles, also allowing a better detectability of the immunolabeling markers (Ozel et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%