1990
DOI: 10.1080/00221689009499060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B-jump in sloping channel, II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Q increases, the upstream Froude number becomes larger, and the katabatic jump becomes stronger. This parametric dependence of the katabatic jump strength on upstream mean Froude number is also common to hydraulic jumps in open channel flows, in which the strength of the hydraulic jump increases with the approach Froude number (e.g., Kawagoshi and Hager, 1990). The scale used for the katabatic jump strength in Figure 6a is similar to that used for tra- ditional hydraulic jumps, while that used in Figure 6b is more suitable for meteorological applications.…”
Section: Sensitivity Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As Q increases, the upstream Froude number becomes larger, and the katabatic jump becomes stronger. This parametric dependence of the katabatic jump strength on upstream mean Froude number is also common to hydraulic jumps in open channel flows, in which the strength of the hydraulic jump increases with the approach Froude number (e.g., Kawagoshi and Hager, 1990). The scale used for the katabatic jump strength in Figure 6a is similar to that used for tra- ditional hydraulic jumps, while that used in Figure 6b is more suitable for meteorological applications.…”
Section: Sensitivity Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For hydraulic jumps, a more efficient stilling basin can be obtained if the sequent depth is lower, the roller length is shorter, and the energy loss in the jump is greater than that in the classical jump. Extensive work has been done in the past on the jumps forming on mild, steep positive, and adverse slopes that were classified by Kindsvater (1944) and Rajaratnam (1966) into jump types A, B, C, D, E, and F. Kindsvater (1944), Bradley and Peterka (1957), Rajaratnam (1966), Hager (1988), Kawagoshi and Hager (1990), Ohtsu and Yasuda (1991), and McCorquodale and Mohamed (1994) are among the many researchers who have undertaken valuable investigations in this field. However, most of these studies dealt with only one specific type of jump.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hager (1988) investigated Bjumps in a channel with a=45° and Kawagoshi and Hager (1990) extended the previous findings to a=30°. According to these Authors, the sequent depth ratio depends on the channel slope, the approach flow Froude number:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%