1996
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1996.870287.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of IFN‐α/β genes: evidence for a dual function of the transcription factor complex ISGF3 in the production and action of IFN‐α/β

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

6
64
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are underscored by our data demonstrating that knockdown of NLRC5 significantly impairs induction of these target genes in the context of CMV infection. IFN-a transcriptional regulation has been shown to be dependent on JAK/STAT signaling via the IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 transcription factor complex (36). PRKRIR encodes for a protein that was first identified as a regulator of P58(IPK), a cellular inhibitor of the RNAdependent protein kinase (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are underscored by our data demonstrating that knockdown of NLRC5 significantly impairs induction of these target genes in the context of CMV infection. IFN-a transcriptional regulation has been shown to be dependent on JAK/STAT signaling via the IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 transcription factor complex (36). PRKRIR encodes for a protein that was first identified as a regulator of P58(IPK), a cellular inhibitor of the RNAdependent protein kinase (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Induction of ISREcontaining genes by either IFNs or both IFNs and virus through different pathways requires different IRF family members: the IFN signaling pathway involves IRF9, and the IFNindependent pathway activated by virus infection requires IRF3 and IRF7. The biological significance of the distinct pathways is obscure, but they do not perform redundant functions, may complement each other for an efficient antiviral response (30,57,58), and may reflect distinct requirements at different stages during virus infection. In addition, in contrast to IRF3, which is constitutively expressed in all cell types and is inducible neither by IFNs nor upon virus infection (59), IRF7 is not constitutively expressed in most cell types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by guest www.bloodjournal.org From B lymphoblasts, MEFs, and patient LDBMCs, is of particular interest because it is the only protein of the IRF family known to complex with STAT molecules. 42 ISGF3␥ exerts its transcriptional activation only in conjunction with STAT1 and STAT2 43 and plays a crucial role in the regulation of IFN-␤ gene expression, [44][45][46] a finding of relevance because some researchers have suggested that the induced expression of IFN-␤ is required for the hematopoietic suppressive effects of IFN␥. 47 IRF-1 is required for carrying out the apoptotic effects of IFN␥ signaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%