1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-3315-6_72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B-scan in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to other studies [2,5], our population was composed entirely of infants with recently diagnosed stage-5 disease. Those with cicatricial disease or long-standing detachment were excluded from the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to other studies [2,5], our population was composed entirely of infants with recently diagnosed stage-5 disease. Those with cicatricial disease or long-standing detachment were excluded from the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A review of these reports shows considerable variability in both the B-scan and Ascan US features (although the latter have been described less frequently) of these cases, even when identical pathological conditions are present. In addition, there is often a discrepancy between US findings and the descriptions based on ophthalmoscopic or intraoperative findings [5]. In many cases of funnel-shaped stage-5 detachments, the US image is characterized by the presence of echogenic retrolental structures, but there is no evidence of the posterior portions of the detached retina [5,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first two papers dealing exclusively with the use of B-scan echography in ROP were presented in 1984 [19,20]. To my knowledge there are still only seven papers on this subject and a few statements published here and there.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To my knowledge there are still only seven papers on this subject and a few statements published here and there. Five of the seven papers were published by clinicians particularly interested in echography and echographers [19,20,21,24,25] and the other two by clinicians belonging to groups having extensive surgical experience on ROP [22,23]. It would appear to be very simple to gather data from such a small sample, but it is just the opposite because there are some considerable discrepancies among the different authors' findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%