2005
DOI: 10.1155/mpe.2005.521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B‐spline collocation methods for numerical solutions of the Burgers′ equation

Abstract: Both time- and space-splitted Burgers' equations are solved numerically. Cubic B-spline collocation method is applied to the time-splitted Burgers' equation. Quadratic B-spline collocation method is used to get numerical solution of the space-splitted Burgers' equation. The results of both schemes are compared for some test problems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the error concentration have been determined over the problem domain, selection of the mesh parameter s , 1 is done over the interval ½0:9; 1 with the increment 0:0001 to find the least error. Comparison of results with the case of s ¼ 1, the best parameter of s in the domain interval and those referenced in the paper (Dag et al (2005) and Ali et al (1992)) are presented in Table II. In Figures 6-8 error distributions of the both schemes at times t ¼ 1:7; t ¼ 2:5 and t ¼ 3:25 are plotted for both uniform and graded meshes together.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the error concentration have been determined over the problem domain, selection of the mesh parameter s , 1 is done over the interval ½0:9; 1 with the increment 0:0001 to find the least error. Comparison of results with the case of s ¼ 1, the best parameter of s in the domain interval and those referenced in the paper (Dag et al (2005) and Ali et al (1992)) are presented in Table II. In Figures 6-8 error distributions of the both schemes at times t ¼ 1:7; t ¼ 2:5 and t ¼ 3:25 are plotted for both uniform and graded meshes together.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table I. At different times, L 1 £ 10 3 errors for n ¼ 0:005 and Dt ¼ 0:01 (Dag et al, 2005) 13.8155 16.7712 13.8155 CBCM (Dag et al, 2005) 27 (Dag et al, 2005) 13.8155 16.7712 13.8155 CBCM (Dag et al, 2005) 27.5770 25.1517 21.0489 Ali et al (1992) 5.880 2.705 2.291 Table II. At different times, L 1 £ 10 3 errors for n ¼ 0:0005 and Dt ¼ 0:01 …”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past decade, the reasonable increase in the computational power permits many researchers to implement and analyze their numerical schemes to solve Burgers' equation. Few of the most popular methods includes B-spline in conjunction with other methods [32][33][34][35][36], Wavelet-Taylor Galerkin method [37], Adomians decomposition method [38], Haar wavelet quasilinearization method [39], Polynomial based differential quadrature method (QDM) [40,41], Combination of method of lines (MOL) and backward differentiation formula (BDF) [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] and [6] used the finite difference method. [7] used the direct variational method while [8] used the projection method by B-spline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%