2019
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.13252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BA3‐SNPs: Contemporary migration reconfigured in BayesAss for next‐generation sequence data

Abstract: Quantifying “demographic independence” is a vital step in establishing potential conservation units for a species in that it effectively distinguishes migration from within‐population reproduction. This is an important aspect because it allows for an accurate estimate of recruitment. For example, populations may be designated as 'management units' (=MUs) if indeed population growth results from local demography rather than immigration. Of additional interest is the calculation of immigrant ancestry and ascerta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BayesAss estimates the posterior probability distribution of the proportion of migrants between all pairwise populations. Thus, this method allowed us to identify recent asymmetric migration by determining the average proportion of migrants (m P ) that are assigned to populations that are closer to the periphery of the distribution (Mussmann et al., 2019; Wilson & Rannala, 2003). For each lineage, we ran MCMC chains 10 identical times for 10 × 10 5 generations (2 × 10 6 burnin) with a sampling frequency of 2 × 10 3 and chose the run with the lowest Bayesian deviance for further analyses to overcome poor MCMC sampling (see Faubet et al., 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BayesAss estimates the posterior probability distribution of the proportion of migrants between all pairwise populations. Thus, this method allowed us to identify recent asymmetric migration by determining the average proportion of migrants (m P ) that are assigned to populations that are closer to the periphery of the distribution (Mussmann et al., 2019; Wilson & Rannala, 2003). For each lineage, we ran MCMC chains 10 identical times for 10 × 10 5 generations (2 × 10 6 burnin) with a sampling frequency of 2 × 10 3 and chose the run with the lowest Bayesian deviance for further analyses to overcome poor MCMC sampling (see Faubet et al., 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that A. eightsii has a pelagic life stage, and its dispersal is likely to be influenced by ocean currents, rates of migration were tested using divM igrate -online [ 33 ] and B ayes A ss 3-SNPS [ 34 ]. The divM igrate -online method is based on defining a hypothetical pool of migrants for a given pair of populations and estimating an appropriate measure of genetic differentiation between each of the two populations and the hypothetical pool.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bayesass3‐snps (Mussmann et al, 2019; Wilson & Rannala, 2003) was used to estimate recent migration rates among populations through MCMC steps. ba3‐autotune was used to select the change size of the parameter value (mixing parameter) at each iteration of the MCMC in bayesass3‐snps as follows: mixing parameter for migration rates (m) 0.15625, mixing parameter for allele frequencies (a) 0.325, mixing parameter for inbreeding coefficients (f) 0.100.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%