2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.01.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Babesia conradae, sp. Nov., a small canine Babesia identified in California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
104
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
104
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2006, PCR‐sequencing of the 18S rRNA gene of this Babesia species revealed a distinct species within a clade of other Babesia ‐like protozoal parasites found in wild animals and humans throughout the western United States; it was re‐named B. conradae 3. Further work described diagnostic and epidemiologic characteristics of the infection and updated the piroplasmal phylogenetic position 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2006, PCR‐sequencing of the 18S rRNA gene of this Babesia species revealed a distinct species within a clade of other Babesia ‐like protozoal parasites found in wild animals and humans throughout the western United States; it was re‐named B. conradae 3. Further work described diagnostic and epidemiologic characteristics of the infection and updated the piroplasmal phylogenetic position 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further work described diagnostic and epidemiologic characteristics of the infection and updated the piroplasmal phylogenetic position 3. The epidemiology of B. conradae transmission is still not fully understood; although the organism was found in the salivary glands of Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks, attempts to transmit infection using ticks were unsuccessful 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important ticktransmitted infections that cause severe clinical illness in South African dogs are babesiosis (Collett, 2000) and ehrlichiosis (Rautenbach et al, 1991;Van Heerden, 1982). Babesia parasites of dogs can be grouped into two groups based on morphology (Kuttler, 1988): the large babesias, known as the Babesia canis group (Uilenberg et al, 1989) and the small babesias, which include the Babesia gibsoni group, Babesia conradae and Theileria annae (Kjemtrup et al, 2000;Kjemtrup et al, 2006;Zahler et al, 2000). The large babesias of dogs have a wide distribution which includes South Africa (Uilenberg et al, 1989), while the small babesias of dogs occur in South-East Asia, North-East Africa, Spain and the USA (Kjemtrup et al, 2000(Kjemtrup et al, , 2006Zahler www.elsevier.com/locate/vetpar Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Veterinary Parasitology 155 (2008) 152-157 et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species has a global distribution and infections have been reported in Asia, Northern Africa, Middle East, United States, Australia, Brazil and Europe (Jefferies et al 2003;Zahler et al 2000a;Criado-Fornelio et al 2003a;Varshney et al 2003Varshney et al , 2004Varshney et al , 2008Trapp et al 2006;Hartelt et al 2007). Recent molecular researches have shown that Californian isolate of small Babesia is genotypically and phenotypically different from the B. gibsoni group and has thus been named Babesia conradae (Kjemtrup et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%