Baby and us: Community-based, Feasibility Trial of a Psychosocial Intervention for New Parents and their Infants

Harwood, Joshua; Fernández, Leire; Vallejo, Valentina; Day, Crispin

doi:10.1007/s10935-022-00685-0

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Four sub-themes were identified under the social interventions theme. This included: (1) 18 studies of 20 person-centred advice/support interventions [ 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 ]; (2) 16 parenting interventions studies [ 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 ] including one study describing three different interventions [ 131 ]; (3) 12 community [ 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 ] or peer-support interventions [ 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 ]; and (4) 7 social prescribing interventions [ 149 , 150 , 15...…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Findings were mixed for person-centred advice/support interventions, with a third reporting a positive impact on wellbeing [ 101 , 102 , 106 , 110 , 116 , 117 ], a third finding no difference [ 103 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 115 ] and the remaining third did not test pre-post differences [ 104 , 105 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 118 ]. Half of the parenting programme interventions reported improved parental wellbeing post-intervention [ 121 , 122 , 123 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 132 ], although only one in six reported a positive impact compared to a control group [ 128 ]. There was minimal evidence to support the beneficial impact of peer support interventions (n = 1/7 [ 137 ]; n = 0/3 compared to control), with mixed evidence for community interventions which focused social or volunteering activities (n = 3/5 [ 144 , 145 , 146 ]; 0 control groups) and social prescribing interventions (n = 4/7 [ 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 ]; 0 control groups).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Forest plot indicating change in WEMWBS score (standardised mean difference) from pre to post intervention for the Social theme for ( A ). Parenting [ 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 ]; ( B ). Community and Peer support [ 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 148 ]; and ( C ).…”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

What Works to Improve Wellbeing? A Rapid Systematic Review of 223 Interventions Evaluated with the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scales

Blodgett

Birch

Musella³

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) is a commonly used scale of mental wellbeing focusing entirely on the positive aspect of mental health. It has been widely used in a broad range of clinical and research settings, including to evaluate if interventions, programmes or pilots improve wellbeing. We aimed to systematically review all interventions that used WEMWBS and evaluate which interventions are the most effective at improving wellbeing. Methods: Eligible populations included children and adults, with no health or age restrictions. Any intervention study was eligible if the wellbeing outcome was measured using the 7 or 14-item WEMWBS scale assessed both pre- and post-intervention. We identified eligible intervention studies using three approaches: a database search (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PyschInfo and Web of Science from January 2007 to present), grey literature search, and by issuing a call for evidence. Narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analysis of standardised mean differences in the intervention group were used to summarise intervention effects on WEMWBS score. Results: We identified 223 interventions across 209 studies, with a total of 53,834 participants across all studies. Five main themes of interventions were synthesised: psychological (n = 80); social (n = 54); arts, culture and environment (n = 29); physical health promotion (n = 18); and other (n = 28). Psychological interventions based on resilience, wellbeing or self-management techniques had the strongest effect on wellbeing. A broad range of other interventions were effective at improving mental wellbeing, including other psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioural therapy, psychoeducation and mindfulness. Medium to strong effects were also seen for person-centred support/advice (social), arts-based, parenting (social) and social prescribing interventions. However, a major limitation of the evidence was that only 75 (36%) of studies included a control group. Conclusions: WEMWBS has been widely used to assess wellbeing across a diverse range of interventions, settings and samples. Despite substantial heterogeneity in individual intervention design, delivery and groups targeted, results indicate that a broad range of intervention types can successfully improve wellbeing. Methodological changes, such as greater use of control groups in intervention evaluation, can help future researchers and policy makers further understand what works for mental wellbeing.

show abstract