Bacillus subtilis RBT-7/32 and Bacillus licheniformis RBT-11/17 as New Promising Strains for Use in Probiotic Feed Additives

Abstract

The normal functioning of a gastrointestinal microflora in poultry and livestock is of significant importance, since its imbalance negatively influences an organism’s functions. In this study, the UV mutagenesis and selection were used to obtain two Bacillus strains possessing antagonistic activity towards Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, and their potential as a probiotic feed additive was evaluated. Compared to the parental strains, the ability of B. subtilis RBT-7/32 and B. licheniformis RBT-11/17 strains to suppress E. coli increased by 77 and 63%, respectively; the corresponding ability of these strains to suppress S. aureus increased by 80 and 79%, respectively. RBT-11/17 could not utilize microcrystalline cellulose and carboxymethyl cellulose, whereas cellulolytic activity of RBT-7/32 was doubled compared to the initial strain. The amylolytic activity of new strains was increased by 40%. Cultivation of strains on media containing soybean, pea, and corn meal did not provide any difference in the biomass production compared to the control. The heating of a water suspension of a dried biomass of the strains for 10–20 min at 80 and 100 °C or incubation in water solutions of citric, ascorbic, acetic, and formic acids (pH 3.0) for 3 and 24 h at 40 °C did not provide any negative influence on the spore survivability. Both strains were evaluated for their resistance to a number of veterinary antibiotics. Thus, RBT-7/32 and RBT-11/17 strains have good prospects for use in feed additives.

Comparative Genomics Unveils Functional Diversity, Pangenome Openness, and Underlying Biological Drivers among Bacillus subtilis Group

“…However, within the investigation scope of the Bs group, there was a scarcity of research systematically comparing and exploring functions based on different species group scales. Traditional comparative genomics compared the model strain genomes with a few sample genomes [24][25][26][27]. However, with the rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technology, hundreds to thousands of different sample genomes can be obtained in a short time.…”