2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0886-7798(03)00026-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Back analysis for tunnel engineering as a modern observational method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to obtain the optimized values of related model parameters which can give a good match between predicted and measured values, back analysis is applied to conduct the parameter optimization [34,35]. Fig.…”
Section: Back Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain the optimized values of related model parameters which can give a good match between predicted and measured values, back analysis is applied to conduct the parameter optimization [34,35]. Fig.…”
Section: Back Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current back-analysis methods include inverse method (Sakurai and Takeuchi 1983;Qiu et al 2003), atlas method (Wang et al 1998), direct inverse analysis (Gioda and Maier 1980;Jia et al 2003;Likar and Vukadin 2003;Fakhimi et al 2004;Oreste 2005;Karakus and Fowell 2005;Zhang et al 2006), back-analysis method of model parameters in geotechnical engineering by an artificial neural network (Pichler et al 2003), intelligent method (Shang et al 2002;Hao et al 2005), and a series of backanalysis procedures in which the identification of strain distribution is sought as the primary goal in order to achieve a solid and reliable routine of observations and data interpretations (Sakurai et al 2003). Based on total or incremental displacement data, the back-analysis method has been successfully applied by many researchers in the construction of tunnels (e.g., Hao et al 2005;Jia et al 2003;Sakurai et al 2003;Qiu et al 2003;Sakurai and Takeuchi 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on total or incremental displacement data, the back-analysis method has been successfully applied by many researchers in the construction of tunnels (e.g., Hao et al 2005;Jia et al 2003;Sakurai et al 2003;Qiu et al 2003;Sakurai and Takeuchi 1983). In addition, the synthetical prediction with back analysis and normal computation was proposed by Yang et al (1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last 25 years, back-analysis (or identification or inversion or characterization) methods have been gradually established in geotechnical engineering for determining the average mechanical or hydraulic parameters of rock masses based on in-situ measurements conducted during excavation or construction works, on surface or underground [2][3][4][5][6]. Back-analysis method has been applied to identify insitu stress field [7,8], rock mass deformation modulus and strength parameters [9], rock mass hydraulic properties, rock mass zoning, boundary conditions [10], loads acting on the tunnel linings, etc., through direct application of closed-form solutions or numerical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to forward analysis, which has unique solution and determines the output such as displacement and stress from inputs such as geological structure, mechanical parameters and in-situ stress, backanalysis cannot guarantee the uniqueness of the solution [6]. Although a unique solution cannot be provided, the results obtained from back-analysis still have engineering value in design confirmation and model verification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%