2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2011.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Back analysis of grouted rock bolt pullout strength parameters from field tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that, as illustrated in Equation 7(St John & Van Dillen 1983), the grout friction angle in the numerical modelling was not considered. Some corrections have since been made by Bin et al (2012) to the cohesive strength and friction angle for numerical purposes. Without these corrections, the model responds as expected according to experience in static conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that, as illustrated in Equation 7(St John & Van Dillen 1983), the grout friction angle in the numerical modelling was not considered. Some corrections have since been made by Bin et al (2012) to the cohesive strength and friction angle for numerical purposes. Without these corrections, the model responds as expected according to experience in static conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical model described in the following sections represents the operating mechanism of the Chilean facility in hopes that it could serve as a complement for the tests to be carried out in the near future. This mechanism was selected considering that some authors have questioned the effect of the other modes of dynamic loading on rock reinforcement elements [8,9,18,42]. The threadbar was selected (known also as rebar or gewibar) as the reinforcement element to be modeled due to its wide use and range of success in Chilean underground mining along with the necessity to improve this element given its possible globalization.…”
Section: Problem Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the parameters controlling the behaviour of the spring-slider system cannot be directly derived from the bolt or grout properties. The she2012ar spring parameters which control the axial behaviour of the pile have been calibrated using data from in-situ pull tests (Bin et al 2012;Nemcik et al 2014). Calibration for normal spring parameters which control the bending and shear behaviour of piles has only been done using laboratory shear tests (Tulu et al ).…”
Section: Numerical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stiffness of the spring represents the deformability of the interface and the cohesion and friction angle control the strength of the interface. The parameters for the shear spring can be obtained using the load-displacement plot from in-situ pull testing of the rock bolt (Bin, Taiyue et al 2012, Nemcik, Ma et al 2014. Calibration of the normal spring parameters which control the shear behaviour of the pile element requires load-displacement data from an insitu shear test of the rock bolt.…”
Section: Calibration Of Pile Element Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%