2023
DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2023.2199173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Back-and-forth conversation during parent–child co-use of an educational app game

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with prior research by Martinez et al [44], parents' advanced educational level increases the effectiveness of parenting techniques and children's academic performance. Parents with a strong educational background can more easily help their children engage with digital technology and digital play at home, as also supported by previous research [45,46]. According to Apdillah et al [47], parents who possess advanced digital skills and maintain a favourable outlook on media generally report better experiences and views on technology-based learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with prior research by Martinez et al [44], parents' advanced educational level increases the effectiveness of parenting techniques and children's academic performance. Parents with a strong educational background can more easily help their children engage with digital technology and digital play at home, as also supported by previous research [45,46]. According to Apdillah et al [47], parents who possess advanced digital skills and maintain a favourable outlook on media generally report better experiences and views on technology-based learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…A Kruskal-Wallis test was also performed on the scores of the three groups (families with one child [A], families with two children [B], and families with three children [C]). The differences between the rank totals of 31.25 (A), 45.77 (B), and 37.67 (C) were significant: H (2, n = 78) = 8.010, p = 0.018 (Appendix A-Table A2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%