Back in black: melanin-rich skin colour associated with increased net diversification rates in birds

Abstract

Evolutionary biologists have long been interested in understanding the factors that promote diversification in organisms, often focussing on distinct and/or conspicuous phenotypes with direct effects on natural or sexual selection such as body size and plumage coloration. However, multiple traits that potentially influence net diversification are not conspicuous and/or might be concealed. One such trait, the dark, melanin-rich skin concealed beneath the feathers, evolved more than 100 times during avian evolution, frequently in association with white feathers on the crown and UV-rich environments, suggesting that it is a UV-photoprotective adaptation. Furthermore, multiple species are polymorphic, having both light and dark skin potentially aiding occupation in different UV radiation environments. As such these polymorphisms are predicted to occur in species with large latitudinal variation in their distribution. Furthermore, by alleviating evolutionary constraints on feather colour, the evolution of dark skin may promote net diversification. Here, using an expanded dataset on bird skin coloration of 3033 species we found that more than 19% of species had dark skin. In contrast to our prediction, dark skinned birds have smaller distribution ranges. Furthermore, both dark skin and polymorphism in skin coloration promote net diversification. These results suggest that even concealed traits can influence large scale evolutionary events such as diversification in birds.

Preliminary evidence that eye appearance in parrots (Psittaciformes) co-varies with latitude and altitude

“…This warrants caution in interpreting these results as biologically meaningful and make it unlikely that our results reflect specifically photoprotective adaptations. Photoprotection in birds has been proposed for various tissues 19 , 63 , but our results specifically show that our measurements are not related to UV-B. In addition, the variation we observe (darker farther from the equator) is the opposite one would expect for photoprotective needs, as UV radiation from the sun is strongest at the equator.…”