Back to the future of academic anaesthesia: publication outputs of UK anaesthetists

Yeung, Joyce; Shelton, Cliff

doi:10.1111/anae.15273

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A key strategic advantage to moving away from RCTs is that there is less reliance on strong academic centres with the capacity to deliver these trials. Instead, as Yeung and Shelton recently observed “academic anaesthesia…belongs to us all” [ 31 ]. In the study designs we believe more relevant to airway research (Table 1 ), all anaesthetists can more readily participate.…”

Section: The Role Of Ethics and Study Design In The New Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

New guidelines for research in airway device evaluation: time for an updated approach (ADEPT-2) to the Difficult Airway Society’s ‘ADEPT’ strategy?

Athanassoglou

O’Sullivan

Zundert

et al. 2022

J Clin Monit Comput

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article we present the learning from a clinical study of airway device evaluation, conducted under the framework of the Difficult Airway Society (DAS, UK) ‘ADEPT’ (airway device evaluation project team) strategy. We recommend a change in emphasis from small scale randomised controlled trials conducted as research, to larger-scale observational, post-marketing evaluation audits as a way of obtaining more meaningful information.

show abstract

Section: The Role Of Ethics and Study Design In The New Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

New guidelines for research in airway device evaluation: time for an updated approach (ADEPT-2) to the Difficult Airway Society’s ‘ADEPT’ strategy?

Athanassoglou

O’Sullivan

Zundert

et al. 2022

J Clin Monit Comput

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…

…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Research priorities and the methods used to address them

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We thank Drs. Yeung and Shelton [1] for their clear and insightful editorial on our academic capacity analysis [2]. It is important to emphasise, however, that our distinction between 'primary' and 'secondary' research was not intended to indicate the 'order of importance' but rather, the logical progression from 'bench to bedside' in translational medicine. Surveys, for example, are undoubtedly important, but, however large or numerous, have never offered insights into fundamental mechanisms.Yeung and Shelton list the priority questions decided by the Responses to previously published articles or letters may be made using the commenting feature on the journal website or

show abstract

“…It is heartening to see that our paper on research output in anaesthesia published 10 years ago [1] continues to generate interest and debate [2, 3]. It is further re‐assuring to read that the decline appears to have been arrested, although sadly not reversed.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%