1976
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(76)90097-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backbending: Coriolis antipairing or rotational alignment?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this simple model the gap decreases monotonically to zero at a critical temperature of T c ∼ 0.5 ∆. However, if particle number is projected out [27,28], the decrease is significantly delayed. The predicted decrease of pair correlations takes place over several MeV of excitation energy [28].…”
Section: Thermodynamic Properties Of Nuclei and Pairingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From this simple model the gap decreases monotonically to zero at a critical temperature of T c ∼ 0.5 ∆. However, if particle number is projected out [27,28], the decrease is significantly delayed. The predicted decrease of pair correlations takes place over several MeV of excitation energy [28].…”
Section: Thermodynamic Properties Of Nuclei and Pairingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In high spin physics, the backbending phenomenon is a beautiful manifestation of the breaking of pairs. The mechanism is induced by Coriolis forces tending to align single particle angular momenta along the nuclear rotational axis [3,4]. Theoretical models also predict reduction in the pair correlations at higher temperatures [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Sect. 4 we present the experimental findings and relate them to the simple pairing model of Sect. 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normalization factor of this state is defined by the matrix element 21) which is determined in a similar way as the norm of the projected BCS function (see Appendix B). The upper limit of the J f is still 24 even after the application of the quasiparticle creation operators, because it is the maximum angular momentum which can be realized in the i 13/2 intruder orbital, irrespective of the number of particles involved.…”
Section: B Spherical Projected States From a Deformed Bcs Statementioning
confidence: 99%