2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backchannels: Quantity, Type and Timing Matters

Abstract: Abstract. In a perception experiment, we systematically varied the quantity, type and timing of backchannels. Participants viewed stimuli of a real speaker side-by-side with an animated listener and rated how human-like they perceived the latter's backchannel behavior. In addition, we obtained measures of appropriateness and optionality for each backchannel from key strokes. This approach allowed us to analyze the influence of each of the factors on entire fragments and on individual backchannels. The original… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In that study and a number of followup studies, it was found that a strategy that just copies the timings of the original listener is often perceived as more natural than a strategy based on hand-designed rules [26,27]. The studies also suggest that random backcanneling according to an Erlang distribution achieves a rather good perceptual naturalness rating from human observers.…”
Section: Backchanneling For Embodied Conversational Agentsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In that study and a number of followup studies, it was found that a strategy that just copies the timings of the original listener is often perceived as more natural than a strategy based on hand-designed rules [26,27]. The studies also suggest that random backcanneling according to an Erlang distribution achieves a rather good perceptual naturalness rating from human observers.…”
Section: Backchanneling For Embodied Conversational Agentsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The time delay is understandable and inevitable as cognition delay. We compared the starting time of PCS-collected backchannels with the original ones to find out the time delay to be approximately 200ms, which is the same as the delay proposed by Poppe et al when they analyzed the influence of quantity, type and timing for backchannel generation of virtual listeners [24]. The final PCS data are obtained by eliminating 200ms delay from the collected clicking time.…”
Section: Data Collection With the Pcs Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bavelas et al [10] found that periods of mutual gaze increased the likelihood of a backchannel occurring. In [13], the effect of quantity, timing and type of backchannel was investigated. Participants were asked to rate whether the reaction of an artificial listener to a real speaker was human-like.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%