2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Background Activation Suppression for Weakly Supervised Object Localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More concretely, if the backbone is VGG16 [45], KD-CI-CAM achieves 79.2% Top-1 classification accuracy that is 1.9% higher than the current SOTA FAM [32] and outperforms it by 3.7% and 2.3% in the Top-1 localization accuracy and GT-known localization accuracy, respectively. Besides, KD-CI-CAM reaches 73.0% Top-1 localization accuracy that is 1.7% higher than the current SOTA BAS [56] and outperforms it by 0.5% in the GT-known localization accuracy. Compared with the GTknown localization SOTA BridgeGap [22], KD-CI-CAM is in a narrow margin that 1.6% lower for the GT-known localization accuracy, but it brings a significant performance gain of 2.2% over BridgeGap [22] in the Top-1 localization accuracy.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…More concretely, if the backbone is VGG16 [45], KD-CI-CAM achieves 79.2% Top-1 classification accuracy that is 1.9% higher than the current SOTA FAM [32] and outperforms it by 3.7% and 2.3% in the Top-1 localization accuracy and GT-known localization accuracy, respectively. Besides, KD-CI-CAM reaches 73.0% Top-1 localization accuracy that is 1.7% higher than the current SOTA BAS [56] and outperforms it by 0.5% in the GT-known localization accuracy. Compared with the GTknown localization SOTA BridgeGap [22], KD-CI-CAM is in a narrow margin that 1.6% lower for the GT-known localization accuracy, but it brings a significant performance gain of 2.2% over BridgeGap [22] in the Top-1 localization accuracy.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…We summarise this issue as a classification-localization dilemma ("C-L dilemma" for short). We argue that these two problems severely hinder the WSOL performance and heretofore yet to be well studied, despite the existence of a vast body of WSOL literature [10,31,52,56,67,69,72].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To relieve the laborious annotations, extensive efforts have been made to address semantic segmentation with less supervision. In the family of weakly-supervised object localization [24,49,53] and semantic segmentation [1,9,51], only class labels are available for supervision. Generally, the class activation maps [57] derived from the classification network serve as the initial segmentation results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%