2005
DOI: 10.1080/15275920500194506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Background Dioxins in House Dusts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrations were low compared with most studies reviewed 6,14,25 and also lower than those of the study of O'Connor and Sabrsula 26 In a ranking of indoor semi-volatile compounds in dust in homes based on literature reported toxicity, Bonvallot et al, 7 , considered PCBs found in household dust a risk factor for infants and children, although the concentrations used in the ranking were those by Harrad et al 6 which were substantially higher than those reported here.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Concentrations were low compared with most studies reviewed 6,14,25 and also lower than those of the study of O'Connor and Sabrsula 26 In a ranking of indoor semi-volatile compounds in dust in homes based on literature reported toxicity, Bonvallot et al, 7 , considered PCBs found in household dust a risk factor for infants and children, although the concentrations used in the ranking were those by Harrad et al 6 which were substantially higher than those reported here.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…The percentage of 2,3,7,8-TCDD compared to total TEQ was highest for the schoolyard (14%) and the market (14%). When compared to house dust, the TEQ values of the workshops were 2 times higher than that of dust from U.S. homes and similar to average values found in houses in Germany in an area known to have high dioxin contamination…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…O'Connor and Sabrsula (2) reported results of measurements of PCDDs and PCDFs (no PCBs were measured) in 14 house dust samples collected from 12 homes in a single community in rural Mississippi. This community was selected because it was not believed to be unduly polluted by airborne dioxins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%