2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.07.030114
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Background white noise and speech facilitate visual working memory

Abstract: Phonological loop and visuospatial sketchpad have been proposed as two independent systems in working memory (WM). Previous studies suggest that background speech but not white noise declines performance of verbal WM.However, whether the background sounds influence visual WM remains unclear. In the present study, participants performed an orientation reproduction task while we played background speech or white noise.Electrodermal activity (EDA) and Electromyography (EMG) were recorded simultaneously. Results i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the auditory white noise (presented at 70 dB) might be intrinsically arousing, irrespective of the inability of subjects to predict when the sound will be presented. Consistent with this idea, continuously presented background auditory white noise also affects human task performance (Corcoran, 1962; Han et al, 2021; Söderlund et al, 2010). Future research should investigate if the bias-suppressing effect of the accessory stimulus also occurs during more frequent accessory stimuli, for example on 25% of 50% of trials (Lippert et al, 2007; Tona et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Second, the auditory white noise (presented at 70 dB) might be intrinsically arousing, irrespective of the inability of subjects to predict when the sound will be presented. Consistent with this idea, continuously presented background auditory white noise also affects human task performance (Corcoran, 1962; Han et al, 2021; Söderlund et al, 2010). Future research should investigate if the bias-suppressing effect of the accessory stimulus also occurs during more frequent accessory stimuli, for example on 25% of 50% of trials (Lippert et al, 2007; Tona et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%