Backreaction on the luminosity-redshift relation from gauge invariant light-cone averaging

Abstract

Using a recently proposed gauge invariant formulation of light-cone averaging, together with adapted "geodesic light-cone" coordinates, we show how an "induced backreaction" effect emerges, in general, from correlated fluctuations in the luminosity distance and covariant integration measure. Considering a realistic stochastic spectrum of inhomogeneities of primordial (inflationary) origin we find that both the induced backreaction on the luminosity-redshift relation and the dispersion are larger than naïvely expected. On the other hand the former, at least to leading order and in the linear perturbative regime, cannot account by itself for the observed effects of dark energy at largeredshifts. A full second-order calculation, or even better a reliable estimate of contributions from the non-linear regime, appears to be necessary before firm conclusions on the correct interpretation of the data can be drawn. PACS numbers: 98.80-k, 95.36.+x, 98.80.Es I. INTRODUCTIONThe so-called concordance (or ΛCDM) model, based on a suitable combination of dark matter, dark energy and baryons for an overall critical density, has become the reference paradigm for the late -i.e. post-equality epochevolution of our Universe (see e.g. [1]). It accounts equally well for the CMB data, the Large Scale Structure and, even more significantly, for the supernovae data in terms of a cosmic acceleration [2].Strictly speaking these three tests of the concordance model are not at the same level of theoretical rigor. While the first two have to do, by definition, with the inhomogeneities present in our Universe, the third is based on an ideal homogeneous and isotropic Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) geometry. It is clear that a better treatment of cosmic acceleration should take inhomogeneities into account, at least in an average statistical sense. Only when this is done we can establish in a convincing way whether ΛCDM gives a simultaneous consistent description of the above-mentioned body of cosmological data.This realization has led to a vast literature about averaging cosmological observables in realistic inhomogeneous cosmologies (see e.g. [3] for recent reviews). The conclusions, however, are still rather controversial: according to some authors [4] present inhomogeneities might explain, by themselves, cosmic acceleration without any need for dark-energy contributions; according to others [5] the effect of inhomogeneities is, instead, completely negligible. The truth may lie somewhere in between, in the sense that a quantitative understanding of inhomogeneities effects could be important in order to put precise constraints on dark-energy parameters, such as the critical fraction of dark-energy density, Ω Λ , and the time evolution of its effective equation of state, w Λ (z).In the first papers studying the dynamical effects of averaging, the problem was approached mainly following Buchert's prescriptions [6], namely averaging inhomogeneities over spacelike hypersurfaces and computing the ensuing "backreaction" on the averaged ge...

Constraining the primordial power spectrum from SNIa lensing dispersion

“…where the gravitational potential Ψ ¼ Ψðη i ; r i ;θ a Þ is evaluated along the past light-cone at Laplacian, see [5,30] for technical terms and explanations. Squaring (2) and taking the ensemble average in Fourier space at a fixed observed redshift, gives the variance, σ 2 μ ðzÞ [34].…”

Light-cone observables and gauge-invariance in the geodesic light-cone formalism

“…Clearly, J 2 (for which we followed the notation introduced in [13]) corresponds to the gravitational lensing convergence κ introduced in sec. 3.2.…”

“…In this appendix we calculate the gravitational lensing convergence κ (or J 2 in [13]) when the degrees of freedom in the GLC angles are fixed in such a way that the GLC angles match the observed angles in the observer rest frame (see appendices B and C To simplify this task, we make use of three unit directional vectors: n α , ϑ α , ϕ α , orthogonal to each other. The observed angular position of the source is represented by the unit vector 11 n α = (sin θ cos φ, sin θ sin φ, cos θ) .…”

Impact of cosmic variance on the local measurement of $H_0$

“…H 0 inferred from the observation of a single SN at redshift z 1, is then expected to deviate from the true H 0 by approximately [22] …”