2013
DOI: 10.1561/9781601986993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backward Simulation Methods for Monte Carlo Statistical Inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
101
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each particle corresponds to an entire trajectory X [0,T ] . Among the various SMC methods for smoothing, one can distinguish broadly speaking three approaches; first, the bootstrap Filter-Smoother (FS) by [5], second, the forwardbackward smoothers [6], [7]-with its many variations [8]and third, the two-filter smoothers [9], [10], [11]. All these methods have their particular strengths and weaknesses.…”
Section: A Particle Filtering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each particle corresponds to an entire trajectory X [0,T ] . Among the various SMC methods for smoothing, one can distinguish broadly speaking three approaches; first, the bootstrap Filter-Smoother (FS) by [5], second, the forwardbackward smoothers [6], [7]-with its many variations [8]and third, the two-filter smoothers [9], [10], [11]. All these methods have their particular strengths and weaknesses.…”
Section: A Particle Filtering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in [17] a rejection sampling approach was suggested to avoid the computational complexity of evaluating all backward weights, effectively reducing the overall computational complexity to O(N ) provided that N is sufficiently large. However in practice, this approach is less efficient than FFBSi for many problems and does not scale to high dimensions [8].…”
Section: A Particle Filtering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vector based state space models, it is often important to consider the posterior density over the state trajectory, which contains the states at all time steps, i.e., it is not sufficient to merely find all the marginal densities of the states at all times [31], [32]. For example, the posterior density over the trajectory is necessary to calculate the maximum a posterior (MAP) estimator of the trajectory [33] or to answer trajectoryrelated questions, e.g., what is the probability that the state was in a region at a time and has moved to another region at a different time step?…”
Section: B Motivation For Sets Of Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the resulting Markov kernel leaves its target distribution invariant, regardless of the number of particles used. In contrast to other particle Gibbs with backward simulation methods [47], [48], PGAS can also be applied to non-Markovian latent variable models, i.e., models that are not expressed on a state-space form [31], [49]. In this section, we briefly describe the PGAS algorithm and provide the necessary equations for its implementation.…”
Section: A Particle Gibbs With Ancestor Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%