1995
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<1320:btlsdm>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backward-Time Lagrangian Stochastic Dispersion Models and Their Application to Estimate Gaseous Emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
235
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 347 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
235
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[13] As long as we consider only linear processes, it is possible to reverse a dispersion problem simply by running a Lagrangian particle dispersion model backward in time (see Flesch et al [1995] for a proof). In analogy to forward simulations we may call the particle cloud produced by a backward simulation a ''retroplume.''…”
Section: Backward Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[13] As long as we consider only linear processes, it is possible to reverse a dispersion problem simply by running a Lagrangian particle dispersion model backward in time (see Flesch et al [1995] for a proof). In analogy to forward simulations we may call the particle cloud produced by a backward simulation a ''retroplume.''…”
Section: Backward Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take emission source strengths from the EDGAR emission inventory and assume that the emissions mix instantaneously into the footprint layer. Our footprint concept is, except for the numerical implementation, equivalent to that of Flesch et al [1995], where particles take up emissions upon touching the ground. Note that it would be possible to also consider sinks (Seibert and Frank, submitted manuscript, 2003), but we focus here on CO, which has a lifetime longer than the transport times considered.…”
Section: Backward Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However enclosure measurements may not always be representative of emissions at the field scale (Genermont and Cellier, 1997;Sintermann et al, 2012). The inverse dispersion method concerns the inferring of the atmospheric emission rate (Q) of localised gas sources from the excess concentration ( C) they cause above background, by modelling the C/Q relationship for a given source-receptor configuration and meteorological state (Flesch et al, 2004(Flesch et al, , 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to modelling results that vary widely, with local recapture ranging from 2 to 60 % within 2 km from the source (Loubet et al, 2006. Accordingly, the modelling of NH 3 deposition can be a challenging undertaking, with models ranging from simple steady-state canopy resistance models to dynamic, bi-directional, multilayer and multi-process chemical species schemes (Flechard et al, 2013). Local-scale deposition models may ignore the wet deposition process, as dry deposition is most likely the dominant deposition mechanism near sources .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since backward-in-time modelling is extensively used in many applications (e.g. Flesch et al 1995;Kljun et al 2002;Seibert and Frank 2004), for completeness and clarity we discuss in some detail the backward-in-time formulation of this model based on Thomson (1987), and we perform consistency tests between backward and forward simulations. The formulation of Luhar et al (1996) assumes that the turbulent statistics are horizontally homogeneous and stationary and, to our knowledge, many operational implementations of the Lagrangian stochastic model used nowadays neglect the horizontal and time derivatives of the turbulence statistics in the model formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%