2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/590298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BACs-on-Beads Technology: A Reliable Test for Rapid Detection of Aneuploidies and Microdeletions in Prenatal Diagnosis

Abstract: The risk of fetal aneuploidies is usually estimated based on high resolution ultrasound combined with biochemical determination of criterion in maternal blood, with invasive procedures offered to the population at risk. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a new rapid aneuploidy screening test on amniotic fluid (AF) or chorionic villus (CV) samples based on BACs-on-Beads (BoBs) technology and to compare the results with classical karyotyping by Giemsa banding (G-banding) of culture… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These cases all involved microdeletions or microduplications, which conventional karyotyping might not be able to detect because they are less than 5 Mb in size—the resolution limit of the method, unless the banding is above the 750‐band level (Choy et al, ); indeed, false‐negative diagnoses occurs most often in karyotyping when the abnormality is less than 5 Mb (Shaffer & Bui, ). Thus, from a cytogenetic point of view, the BoBs™ assay could offer extra diagnostic benefits compared with karyotyping because it provides more diversity and sensitivity to detect microdeletions and microduplications (Garcia‐Herrero et al, ; Rosenfeld et al, ; Sheath, Duffy, Asquith, Love, & George, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These cases all involved microdeletions or microduplications, which conventional karyotyping might not be able to detect because they are less than 5 Mb in size—the resolution limit of the method, unless the banding is above the 750‐band level (Choy et al, ); indeed, false‐negative diagnoses occurs most often in karyotyping when the abnormality is less than 5 Mb (Shaffer & Bui, ). Thus, from a cytogenetic point of view, the BoBs™ assay could offer extra diagnostic benefits compared with karyotyping because it provides more diversity and sensitivity to detect microdeletions and microduplications (Garcia‐Herrero et al, ; Rosenfeld et al, ; Sheath, Duffy, Asquith, Love, & George, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional molecular and classical cytogenetic methods that evaluate uncultured samples were developed to rapidly (in 48 hr) exclude recurrent aneuploidies for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, and X/Y of foetal chromosome unbalances (Grati et al, ; Mann et al, ; Shaffer & Bui, ). In some countries, these rapid and cheaper methods are the only techniques used to diagnose cases involving advanced maternal age or increased risk after maternal screening (Garcia‐Herrero et al, ); however, even these methods have limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concordance of Prenatal BoBs results with KT/FISH results for common aneuploidies is consistent with earlier reports. 1 Prenatal BoBs can be reported within 2 days from receipt of sample, and this is essential to reduce maternal anxiety and facilitate timely clinical decisions. 27 Prenatal BoBs circumvents two main limitations of KT, higher TAT and detection of the nine microdeletion syndromes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of fetal aneuploidies for chromosomes 21, 18 and 13 is usually estimated using ultrasound scan (nuchal translucency) in combination with various biochemical markers. 1,2 Since the past few years, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is increasingly being used to screen for aneuploidies of chromosomes 21, 18 and 13, sex chromosome aneuploidies and some microdeletions. 3,4 More recently, NIPT has been reported to screen for aneuploidies of all the chromosomes and also sub-chromosomal aberrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%