2004
DOI: 10.1177/154405910408300217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacteremia Following Surgical Dental Extraction with an Emphasis on Anaerobic Strains

Abstract: Our aim was to investigate bacteremia caused by surgical extraction of partly erupted mandibular third molars. From 16 young adults, bacterial samples were taken from the third-molar pericoronal pocket and post-operatively from the extraction socket, and blood samples were drawn from the ante-cubital vein up to 30 min after surgery. Of the subjects, 88% had detectable bacteremia-50% 1 min after the incision, 44% immediately after extraction. The respective percentages at 10, 15, and 30 min were 44%, 25%, and 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
5
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
50
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a number of studies, the incidence of bacteremia ranges from 13 to 96%, depending on the evaluated time intervals as well as other experimental variables studied (Table 2). It has been shown that bacteremias can follow simple dental extractions as well as extractions of impacted teeth that entail minor surgical intervention (76,103,109,110,132,137,140). In such circumstances, the bacteremic incidence appears to be influenced positively by the presence of gingivitis, periodontitis, and other odontogenic infections, such as dentoalveolar abscesses, suggesting a direct relationship between an increased bacterial biofilm burden and bacteremia (15, 26, 128, 132).…”
Section: Tooth Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a number of studies, the incidence of bacteremia ranges from 13 to 96%, depending on the evaluated time intervals as well as other experimental variables studied (Table 2). It has been shown that bacteremias can follow simple dental extractions as well as extractions of impacted teeth that entail minor surgical intervention (76,103,109,110,132,137,140). In such circumstances, the bacteremic incidence appears to be influenced positively by the presence of gingivitis, periodontitis, and other odontogenic infections, such as dentoalveolar abscesses, suggesting a direct relationship between an increased bacterial biofilm burden and bacteremia (15, 26, 128, 132).…”
Section: Tooth Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacteria commonly gain entrance to the circulation through ulcerated gingival crevicular tissue that surrounds the teeth. 23 Although dental extractions are among the most likely of dental procedures to cause bacteremia, toothbrushing may disrupt a far larger surface area of gingival crevicular tissue. Although brushing does not appear to have the same incidence and nature of bacteremia as a dental extraction, we found a substantial incidence (23%) of bacteremia of IE-causing species from this common daily oral hygiene activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature suggests that the detection of bacteria after a tooth extraction drops off sharply after 10 minutes, and isolated reports indicate that positive blood cultures can be detected for as long as 30 minutes after a dental procedure. 8,12,20,23 Finally, the extent to which systemic antibiotics reduce the incidence, duration, nature, and magnitude of bacteremia from dental procedures is controversial as well. 5,24 Clinical Perspective p 3125…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajasuo et al (2004) found that the detectable bacteremia at 10, 15, and 30 minutes were 44%, 25%, and 13%, respectively. Most prevalent aerobes were VGS and the Streptococcus milleri group (45).…”
Section: Bacteremia and Viridans Group Streptococcimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajasuo et al (2004) found that the detectable bacteremia at 10, 15, and 30 minutes were 44%, 25%, and 13%, respectively. Most prevalent aerobes were VGS and the Streptococcus milleri group (45). The world literature on the incidence of bacteremia after dental extraction shows that the incidence of bacteremia varies from 13% to 96% Arch Pediatr Infect Dis.…”
Section: Bacteremia and Viridans Group Streptococcimentioning
confidence: 99%