1950
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(50)90148-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacteremias of dental origin. II. A study of the factors influencing occurrence and detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
44
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were obtained by Robinson et al 37. in patients chewing wax, and by Cobe21 in patients chewing gum.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similar results were obtained by Robinson et al 37. in patients chewing wax, and by Cobe21 in patients chewing gum.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The experiments cited above, 2 supported the finding of Waerhaug, 1 and confirmed the suggestions of Brill and Krasse, 3 and Brill and Bjorn, 4 that the flow of tissue…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…They also included organisms other than streptococci in their report. These same organisms had been eliminated from the series by Robinson, et al, 3 because they were considered contaminants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Here, again, previous studies have produced conflicting results, with Peterson and Peacock (1976) and Robinson et al (1950) finding no significant difference between the incidence of bacteremia following extraction of abscessed teeth with inflamed gingivae and the extraction of sound teeth, while Speck et al (1976) found bacteremia more common after extraction of abscessed teeth. However, they showed no relationship between the incidence of bacteremia and the number or type of teeth extracted, while Bender et al (1963) and Robinson et al (1950) found increased bacteremia following multiple extractions. However, no quantitative assessment of gingival health or plaque related to either the incidence or intensity of bacteremia has been attempted by previous workers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Studies limited to children have shown a lower incidence of bacteremia than that found in adults. This may be due to difficulty in the culturing of small samples of blood or, as suggested by Robinson et al (1950), the bacteria are unevenly distributed, and a large blood sample is required for detection to be ensured. The results of the present study are comparable with rates detected in adults (Everett and Hirschmann, 1977;Khairat, 1966).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%