2014
DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.249276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacteria-Triggered Systemic Immunity in Barley Is Associated with WRKY and ETHYLENE RESPONSIVE FACTORs But Not with Salicylic Acid

Abstract: Leaf-to-leaf systemic immune signaling known as systemic acquired resistance is poorly understood in monocotyledonous plants. Here, we characterize systemic immunity in barley (Hordeum vulgare) triggered after primary leaf infection with either Pseudomonas syringae pathovar japonica (Psj) or Xanthomonas translucens pathovar cerealis (Xtc). Both pathogens induced resistance in systemic, uninfected leaves against a subsequent challenge infection with Xtc. In contrast to systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
89
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(176 reference statements)
3
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, no significant changes to JA levels were detected except for a decrease in Mundah ( Figure 5 ). Concentrations of JA measured in barley roots here were much lower (less than 0.1 ng g -1 FW and close to limit of quantitation; Figure 5 ) than concentrations reported for barley leaves in an earlier study (Dey et al, 2014). JA is primarily synthesized and stored in leaves, flowers and fruits (Baldwin et al, 1994; Creelman and Mullet, 1995), which would explain the large concentration differences between roots and leaves.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In the present study, no significant changes to JA levels were detected except for a decrease in Mundah ( Figure 5 ). Concentrations of JA measured in barley roots here were much lower (less than 0.1 ng g -1 FW and close to limit of quantitation; Figure 5 ) than concentrations reported for barley leaves in an earlier study (Dey et al, 2014). JA is primarily synthesized and stored in leaves, flowers and fruits (Baldwin et al, 1994; Creelman and Mullet, 1995), which would explain the large concentration differences between roots and leaves.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Moreover, SA-independent SAR activation, which is moderate for Arabidopsis ( Figures 2B and 2C), might be more pronounced in monocots, as activation of systemic immunity in barley by leaf inoculation with bacterial pathogens has been shown to proceed in an NPR1-independent manner (Dey et al, 2014). Which molecular components besides Pip and FMO1 could be involved in the SA-independent signaling pathway leading to partial SAR and defense priming in Arabidopsis?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WRKY TFs show high binding affinity to the W‐box sequence (T/C)TGAC(C/T) (Rushton et al ., ). The WRKY TFs are known to play critical roles in biotic and abiotic stress responses, such as pathogen infection (Liu et al ., ; Mao et al ., ; Chen et al ., ; Dey et al ., ), high salt (Niu et al ., ; Liang et al ., ), drought stress (Luo et al ., ; Sun et al ., ; Li et al ., ), oxidative stress (Yan et al ., ), nutrient stress (Chen et al ., ; Su et al ., ; Dai et al ., ) and high temperature (Cai et al ., ; He et al ., ). In addition to their important role in stress responses, WRKYs are also involved in a wide range of plant growth and development processes, such as seed dormancy and germination (Luo et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ; Ding et al ., ), seed size (Gu et al ., ), fruit maturation (Cheng et al ., ; Ye et al ., ) and senescence (Besseau et al ., ; Meng et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%