2014
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2013.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial Biofilms on Implanted Suture Material Are a Cause of Surgical Site Infection

Abstract: Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) has been estimated to occur in up to 5% of all procedures, accounting for up to 0.5% of all hospital costs. Bacterial biofilms residing on implanted foreign bodies have been implicated as contributing or causative factors in a wide variety of infectious scenarios, but little consideration has been given to the potential for implanted, submerged suture material to act as a host for biofilm and thus serve as a nidus of infection. Methods: We report a series of 15 patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These biofilms can serve as a nidus of infection leading to exacerbation of the wound and delayed healing. While their development and persistence is multifactorial, it is clear that chronic nonhealing skin wounds are often infected with pathogenic biofilms that impact the healing process . The overall focus of our research team is to develop novel biomaterial‐based dressings, which can be applied to chronic nonhealing skin wounds, to prevent formation of or eliminate bacterial biofilms on the skin wound bed and aid healing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These biofilms can serve as a nidus of infection leading to exacerbation of the wound and delayed healing. While their development and persistence is multifactorial, it is clear that chronic nonhealing skin wounds are often infected with pathogenic biofilms that impact the healing process . The overall focus of our research team is to develop novel biomaterial‐based dressings, which can be applied to chronic nonhealing skin wounds, to prevent formation of or eliminate bacterial biofilms on the skin wound bed and aid healing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While their development and persistence is multifactorial, it is clear that chronic nonhealing skin wounds are often infected with pathogenic biofilms that impact the healing process. 9,47 The overall focus of our research team is to develop novel biomaterial-based dressings, which can be applied to chronic nonhealing skin wounds, to prevent formation of or eliminate bacterial biofilms on the skin wound bed and aid healing. In this study, we documented that the essential amino acid tryptophan inhibits P. aeruginosa biofilms on a clinically relevant biological wound dressing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major causes of concern with implant infections is the early development of biofilms, with S. aureus commonly isolated as the cause. [7678] Retention of implants, however, may result in failure to resolve these infections, requiring revision surgery with antibiotic treatment. Irrigation and/or pulsed lavage are other physical removal techniques that have been used extensively.…”
Section: Physical Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon has led scientists and surgeons to search for local innovative solutions so as to block mesh infection because usually the single effective intervention that can be applied is to remove the mesh in infected cases and to try to repair the defect without using prosthetic material [70][71][72][73][74][75].…”
Section: Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Prolonged Antibiotic Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%