2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial community structure and removal performances in IFAS-MBRs: A pilot plant case study

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe paper reports the results of an experimental campaign carried out on a University of Cape Town (UCT) integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) membrane bioreactor (MBR) pilot plant. The pilot plant was analysed in terms of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and nutrients removal, kinetic/stoichiometric parameters, membrane fouling and sludge dewaterability. Moreover, the cultivable bacterial community structure was also analysed.The pilot plant showed excellent COD removal efficiency throughou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig. 13 , it was proved that increasing influent flow had no significant effect in terms of BOD 5 and NH 4 -N removal; this may be ascribed to the activity of biomass attached to the media in aeration tank that supports the addition of both heterotrophic and nitrifier bacteria (Randall & Sen, 1996 ; Sirianuntapiboon & Yommee, 2006 ), but a significant effect in terms of TSS and COD removal was observed, and this could be ascribed to complex degradation of low-strength substrate (Mannina et al, 2017 ).
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig. 13 , it was proved that increasing influent flow had no significant effect in terms of BOD 5 and NH 4 -N removal; this may be ascribed to the activity of biomass attached to the media in aeration tank that supports the addition of both heterotrophic and nitrifier bacteria (Randall & Sen, 1996 ; Sirianuntapiboon & Yommee, 2006 ), but a significant effect in terms of TSS and COD removal was observed, and this could be ascribed to complex degradation of low-strength substrate (Mannina et al, 2017 ).
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism and design of the IFAS process have been widely investigated for enhancing nitrogen removal in the conventional activated sludge (CAS) process by treating municipal wastewater [17,24]. A good balance in organics and nutrients removal has been reported by the IFAS system [51]. Nitrogen removal of the BNR system was affected by various parameters, especially the bacterial community of the biomass [52].…”
Section: Enhancing Nitrogen Removal Mechanism Of Ifas Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COD can be useful in pinpointing toxic condition and presence of biological resistant substances. Besides, MBBR and IFAS system which are adopted in RWTP are proven to improve the amount of COD up to 95% [21], [22]. There are 66% of total effluents BOD are not achieved to the range published by INWQS Class IIB (Fig 5).…”
Section: Effluent Water Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28] Nitrification process able to specific reduce ammonia content by Ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation (Annamox). [29], [30] In pilot case study, from a retrofit Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) to IFAS was conducted by Zhao 2018, the IFAS unit able to reduce 90% of CBOD and 96% of AN. [31].…”
Section: Pollutant Removal Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%