2018
DOI: 10.4314/ajcem.v20i1.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial contamination of toilet door handles on Baze University campus Abuja Nigeria

Abstract: Aim: Contracting infectious diseases from microbial contaminated toilet door handles is a potential threat to public health and safety. Therefore we performed microbiological screening of toilet door handles in twelve рublic toilets on Baze University campus for bacterial contamination. Methodology and Results: Biochemical analysis of bacterial isolates from entrance toilet door handles in six building blocks on Baze University camрus, revealed a general contamination by mainly seven bacterial species associat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally these are a threat to the health of the immunocompromised and immunosuppressed users. Similar enteric and skin flora such as Staphylococcus aureus (42.9%), Salmonella typhimurium (21.4%), Escherichia coli (14.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.5%), Proteus mirablis (4.8%) Klebsiella oxytoca (4.8%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (2.3%) were found in a study by Alonge, Auwal, & Aboh, 2019. The presence of the enteric bacteria on the fomites indicate possible faecal contamination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Generally these are a threat to the health of the immunocompromised and immunosuppressed users. Similar enteric and skin flora such as Staphylococcus aureus (42.9%), Salmonella typhimurium (21.4%), Escherichia coli (14.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.5%), Proteus mirablis (4.8%) Klebsiella oxytoca (4.8%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (2.3%) were found in a study by Alonge, Auwal, & Aboh, 2019. The presence of the enteric bacteria on the fomites indicate possible faecal contamination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Similar to reports by previous studies, this study observed high levels of bacterial load (3.6×10 4 -2.7×10 5 CFU/cm 3 ; 4.46 -5.43 Log10 CFU) associated with the various toilet surfaces. The load in this study was slightly higher than that described by Odigie and colleagues (3.43 to 4.90 Log10 CFU), much lower than that described by Alonge and colleagues who reported figures above 1.0×10 7 CFU/ml and similar to reports by Sampson and colleagues (Odigie et al, 2017;Alonge et al, 2019;Sampson et al, 2019). Comparison could not be made with a number of other studies which simply reported high levels of bacterial contamination without presenting information on specific levels of bacterial load (Bashir et al, 2016;Abiose 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The microbial flora of door handles in this study somewhat concurs with that of 5 other studies that were performed in different parts of the world. [11][12][13][14][15][16] Bacillus spp., the predominant organism in the current study was the second most common in a study in Bangladesh. 14 Staphylococcus aureus, which was the second most common organism in the current study, was the most predominant in 5 studies performed in Nigeria, Malawi, Saudi Arabia, and Lebanon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in low prevalence, a wide range of enteric bacteria were isolated from door handles in our study, which concurs with the previous studies. [11][12][13][14][15][16] The overall prevalence of all enteric bacteria in this study was calculated to be 36%; Citrobacter spp. was the most common organism isolated, followed by Salmonella spp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%