2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2015.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial ecology of abattoir wastewater treated by an anaerobic digestor

Abstract: Wastewater from an anaerobic treatment plant at a slaughterhouse was analysed to determine the bacterial biodiversity present. Molecular analysis of the anaerobic sludge obtained from the treatment plant showed significant diversity, as 27 different phyla were identified. Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Thermotogae, Euryarchaeota (methanogens), and msbl6 (candidate division) were the dominant phyla of the anaerobic treatment plant and represented 21.7%, 18.5%, 11.5%, 9.4%, 8.9%, and 8.8% of the tota… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous study comparing the diversities of these genera at the beginning of sampling and after cultivation. Desulfovibrio, Desulfobulbus, and Desulfomicrobium genus as dominant among sulfate-reducers in the bioreactors were detected [74,[87][88][89]. Desulfobulbus genus can incompletely oxidize numerous organics including glucose, propionate, and pyruvate to acetate allowing the sulfidogenic anaerobic digestion of sulfate waste from anaerobic sludge [88].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous study comparing the diversities of these genera at the beginning of sampling and after cultivation. Desulfovibrio, Desulfobulbus, and Desulfomicrobium genus as dominant among sulfate-reducers in the bioreactors were detected [74,[87][88][89]. Desulfobulbus genus can incompletely oxidize numerous organics including glucose, propionate, and pyruvate to acetate allowing the sulfidogenic anaerobic digestion of sulfate waste from anaerobic sludge [88].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microbial consortium present in SWW help in improved biogas yield through degradation of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose and utilization of reducing sugar thus produced. (Baker, Mohamed, Al‐Gheethi, & Aziz, 2020; Jabari et al, 2016; Li, Jia, et al, 2018; Li, Jin, Borrion, & Li, 2018; Pereda Reyes & Sárvári Horváth, 2015). Solid‐state anaerobic fermentation of FVW gives enhanced biogas yield and overcomes the voluminous water requirements of submerged fermentation (Li et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, culture-based approaches are not appropriate for comprehensive studies of the diversity and abundance of ARGs as well as the incidence of MGEs in WWTPs (Wang et al, 2013). To date, a variety of molecular approaches have been applied to study the relationships between wastewater microbial communities and treatment process performance (Shah, 2014;Jabari et al, 2016;Gómez-Villalba, 2006;Kim et al, 2013;McIlroy et al, 2015;Ju et al, 2014). A brief summary of the most commonly used molecular techniques is provided in Table 1.1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%