2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1043338/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial Endophytes As Indicators of Susceptibility To Cercospora Leaf Spot (CLS) Disease In Beta vulgaris L.

Abstract: Background: The fungus Cercospora beticola causes Cercospora Leaf Spot (CLS) of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Despite the global importance of this disease, durable resistance to CLS has still not been obtained. Therefore, the development of tolerant hybrids is still a major goal for sugar beet breeding. Although recent studies have suggested that the leaf microbiome composition can offer useful predictors to assist plant breeders, this is an untapped resource in sugar beet breeding efforts. Methods: Using Io… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacterial phyllosphere communities differ between petioles and laminae: Phyllobacterium, Methylobacterium, and Sphingomonas are higher-abundant, while Pseudomonas and Enterobacteriaceae are lower-abundant in petioles (Okazaki et al, 2021). Phyllosphere abundance of Methylobacterium and Mucilaginibacter was further linked to tolerance toward leaf pathogen Cercospora beticola in both sea beets and sugar beets (Broccanello et al, 2022). In contrast to bacteria, fungi isolated from sugar beet leaves usually belong to opportunistic plant pathogens (Alternaria, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Acremonium, Fusarium, Penicillium, Phoma, Plectosphaerella, Pleospora, Pythium) but also saprobionts (Cryptococcus, Epicoccum, Sporobolomyces, Stemphylium) (Thompson et al, 1993;Larran et al, 2000;Shi et al, 2009a;Pusenkova et al, 2016).…”
Section: Microbial Assembly and Dynamics In The Sugar Beet Phyllospherementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bacterial phyllosphere communities differ between petioles and laminae: Phyllobacterium, Methylobacterium, and Sphingomonas are higher-abundant, while Pseudomonas and Enterobacteriaceae are lower-abundant in petioles (Okazaki et al, 2021). Phyllosphere abundance of Methylobacterium and Mucilaginibacter was further linked to tolerance toward leaf pathogen Cercospora beticola in both sea beets and sugar beets (Broccanello et al, 2022). In contrast to bacteria, fungi isolated from sugar beet leaves usually belong to opportunistic plant pathogens (Alternaria, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Acremonium, Fusarium, Penicillium, Phoma, Plectosphaerella, Pleospora, Pythium) but also saprobionts (Cryptococcus, Epicoccum, Sporobolomyces, Stemphylium) (Thompson et al, 1993;Larran et al, 2000;Shi et al, 2009a;Pusenkova et al, 2016).…”
Section: Microbial Assembly and Dynamics In The Sugar Beet Phyllospherementioning
confidence: 98%
“…With currently available data, it appears that phyllosphere bacterial diversity shifted and increased during domestication, while rhizosphere diversity decreased (see Section 2.6); sea beet phyllospheres are strongly dominated by Sphingomonas and Methylobacterium, together accounting for ca. 84% relative abundance (Broccanello et al, 2022). This however could as well refer to fertilization regimes, since bacterial phyllosphere microbiomes in sugar beet respond stronger upon NPK fertilization than in bacterial endosphere communities (Okazaki et al, 2021).…”
Section: Microbial Assembly and Dynamics In The Sugar Beet Phyllospherementioning
confidence: 99%