2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial filtration rates in repacked and weathered soil columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5). The relation indicates that as the average pore water velocity increases, AgNPs filtration decreases, which is in agreement with Safadoust et al (2011) who reported that the filtration coefficient for E. coli in soil columns increased as a result of a reduced flow rate. The data points in Fig.…”
Section: Transport and Retention Of Agnps Through Saturated And Unsatsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5). The relation indicates that as the average pore water velocity increases, AgNPs filtration decreases, which is in agreement with Safadoust et al (2011) who reported that the filtration coefficient for E. coli in soil columns increased as a result of a reduced flow rate. The data points in Fig.…”
Section: Transport and Retention Of Agnps Through Saturated And Unsatsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is expected that much larger λ f values should be observed in natural soil columns compared with the homogenous sand columns. The key role of soil structure and texture in the transport and retention of particles has been demonstrated in several studies (e.g., Safadoust et al, 2011). However, in our study, λ f is not significantly affected by soil texture and saturation conditions (Table 4).…”
Section: Transport and Retention Of Agnps Through Saturated And Unsatsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…There were no significant differences in the performance of the soil in filtering E. coli between the drip irrigated system with canal water and furrow irrigated treatment with canal water. The soil filtering described here is for lateral flow of water, in some ways analogous to previous published research on soil filtering of bacteria under vertical flow of water in soil and water columns (Jamieson et al, 2002;Unc and Goss, 2004;Mankin et al, 2007;Semenov et al, 2009;Safacoust et al, 2011Safacoust et al, , 2012. Regardless of initial counts, concentrations were typically highest near the drip tape for SDI or water's edge of furrow irrigation, lower at the points halfway between the drip tape/furrow and onion bulbs, and lowest at spots adjacent to the onions.…”
Section: Soil Filtration Of E Colimentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Semenov et al (2009) found limited E. coli movement in the field beyond the application layer with surface application of E. coli. Recovery rates of E. coli from water flowing through soil columns were tested for two different soil types, two different flow rates, and two different methods of preparing the soil for the columns (repacked or physically and biologically weathered) (Safacoust et al, 2011). In all eight instances, the E. coli recovery diminished with increasing soil depths of 15, 30, and 45 cm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore a solution spreader (mini column with the diameter as the same as soil column and the high of 10 cm) was placed on soil columns to spread the bromide solution (hydraulic head) on the soil columns ( Figure 1). A gentle suction was created by a vacuum pump on the bottom of the single grain (0.3 ± 0.05 hPa) and prismatic (0.1 ± 0.05 hPa) columns due to their low conductivity in order to avoid water accumulation at the lower boundary of the columns and to ensure a steady-state flow condition (Mosaddeghi et al 2009;Safadoust et al 2011Safadoust et al , 2012aSafadoust et al , 2012b. It was necessary to increase the pressure gradient to compensate for the lower hydraulic A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t conductivity of these columns, resulting in similar flow rate.…”
Section: Insert Figure 1 Herementioning
confidence: 99%