2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial keratitis: identifying the areas of clinical uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 409 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[34][35][36][37] PK: ocular penetration of FQs For a topically applied antimicrobial, the PK refers to the process by which it reaches its target site and determines the optimum dosage regimen (how much and how often) to maintain the concentration in the cornea within the therapeutic range. 3 Important components include the half-life, protein binding, and the time that the concentration of the antimicrobial in the cornea remains above the MIC. Common associations with corneal ulceration, such as reflex lacrimation, inflammatory discharge, nasolacrimal duct obstruction or a keratinised ocular surface, can all affect the PK.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[34][35][36][37] PK: ocular penetration of FQs For a topically applied antimicrobial, the PK refers to the process by which it reaches its target site and determines the optimum dosage regimen (how much and how often) to maintain the concentration in the cornea within the therapeutic range. 3 Important components include the half-life, protein binding, and the time that the concentration of the antimicrobial in the cornea remains above the MIC. Common associations with corneal ulceration, such as reflex lacrimation, inflammatory discharge, nasolacrimal duct obstruction or a keratinised ocular surface, can all affect the PK.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Due to limited data to establish ophthalmic breakpoints, EUCAST recommends epidemiological cut-off values as an alternative to indicate susceptibility to topical agents, determined from a comparison of the antimicrobial MIC distribution representative of the wild-type bacterial population with the MIC distribution in a population with a well characterised resistance mechanism to the antibiotic. 3 Until topical ophthalmic breakpoints are established, we believe that it is preferable for the microbiology laboratory to provide the clinician with both the MIC and the bacterial susceptibility estimated from the systemic breakpoint. The clinician could then refer to the expected corneal concentration, for example, the first quartile in online supplemental table 1, and decide if the MIC is above or below that concentration.…”
Section: Pharmacodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations