Bacterial leakage analysis of root canal obturated using single cone technique with three different root canal sealers and three different coronal restorative

Elsherief, Samia; El-Marsafy, S. M.; Youssef, Abdel‐Rahman

doi:10.21608/edj.2019.72625

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, MTA Fillapex ® is paste/paste material marketed in auto mix double syringes or tubes with nanoparticles incorporated in its composition resulting in a homogeneous mix and enhanced flow (6) . This is combined with its excellent sealing ability as claimed by the manufacturers (7,8) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Evaluation of the apical microleakage of three different root-end filling materials

rahman

hassan

mallah

2021

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Attempts for preserving endodontically treated teeth after root canal treatment failure have directed the clinicians to surgical intervention; apicectomies with root end resection followed by placement of root-end filling material. Different techniques are used to assess the quality of the apical seal obtained by root end filling materials. Dye penetration is considered the most popular technique. Objective: this in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the apical microleakage of three rootend filling materials.Methods: Twenty one upper incisors were utilized, root canals instrumentation was achieved by ProTaper system. Obturation was conducted by lateral condensation technique using Protaper universal gutta percha points. Teeth were apically resected at an angle of 90° to the long axis of the root and root end cavities were prepared and filled. The samples were coated with varnish, then were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. Roots were then sectioned bucco-lingually in a longitudinal direction. Extent of dye penetration was detected by the use of stereomicroscope.Results: The highest mean value was recorded in MTA group, followed by Guttaflow bioactive and Endoseal groups, where both almost recorded the same mean values. Tukey's post hoc test revealed no statistically significant difference between the three tested groups. Conclusion:It can be concluded that; all the three groups showed microleakage and none of the three root-end filling materials was able to achieve perfect apical seal. The result also showed that guttaflow bioactive provides a similar reliable seal compared to MTA Fillapex and Endoseal MTA.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Evaluation of the apical microleakage of three different root-end filling materials

rahman

hassan

mallah

2021

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Endodontic therapy aims to achieve thorough cleaning, shaping, and complete filling of the root canal system in all three dimensions [ 1 , 2 ], with the primary objective of creating a hermetic seal to prevent the ingress of microorganisms and their byproducts into the periapical tissues [ 3 ]. Inadequate obturation of the root canal space significantly contributes to endodontic treatment failure, accounting for approximately 60% of such cases [ 3 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Apical Sealing Capacity of ActiV GP/Glass Ionomer Sealer Versus Resilon/RealSeal and Gutta Percha/AH plus Sealers

Khanvilkar,

Dundappa,

Chaubey

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: In recent years, concerns have arisen regarding the sealing efficacy of traditional root canal obturation materials such as gutta-percha (GP) and various sealers. The resin-based obturation complexes like RealSeal TM (SybronEndo, Orange, CA) and Resilon TM (Resilon Research LLC, Madison, CT) had been developed as replacements for conventional obturation materials, gutta-percha, and various types of sealers. Additionally, ActiV GP TM (Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA), a glass-ionomer-based obturation system, has gained attention. Aim: This in vitro study's objective was to evaluate ActiV GP TM /GI (glass ionomer) sealer's sealing capacity and compare it to that of Resilon TM /RealSeal TM as well as gutta-percha/AH Plus TM (Dentsply International Inc, York, PA) taken as a control. Methods and materials: In this in vitro investigation, 90 freshly excised single-rooted human premolars of the mandible were chosen. According to the substance used to seal the root canals, the teeth were randomly separated into three separate groups (n=30). Group 1: The ActiV GP TM obturation system was used to seal and obturate the canals. Group 2: Resilon TM /RealSeal TM was used to obturate and block the canals. Group 3: GP points and AH Plus TM were used to seal the canals employing the lateral condensation methodology. All of the root surfaces-aside from the last 2 mm of the root-were painted with two coats of nail polish before being submerged in 2% methylene blue for a duration of 24 hours at a temperature of 37°C. The highest amount of dye leakage was determined using a stereomicroscope at 20X magnification. Results: The extent of dye penetration at the apical region in specimens of the ActiV GP TM category was 4.93±1.48 mm. The depth of dye penetration at the apical region in specimens of the Resilon TM category was 2.78 ±1.62 mm. The extension of penetration of dye was 0.48± 0.46 mm in specimens of the GP/AH Plus TM category. The degree of microlikeage was maximum in ActiV GP TM specimens and it was minimum in GP/AH Plus TM specimens. The microlikeage in specimens of the Resilon category was greater than GP/AH plus TM while it was lower than ActiV GP TM specimens. The observations were statistically meaningful (p<0.001). Conclusion: Based on the results of the dye penetration examination, it can be concluded that the root canal wall sealing capabilities of ActiV GP TM with GI Sealer were inferior to those of GP/AH Plus TM and Resilon TM with RealSeal TM .

show abstract

Bacterial leakage analysis of root canal obturated using single cone technique with three different root canal sealers and three different coronal restorative

Cited by 2 publications

References 29 publications

Evaluation of the apical microleakage of three different root-end filling materials

Evaluation of the apical microleakage of three different root-end filling materials

Comparison of Apical Sealing Capacity of ActiV GP/Glass Ionomer Sealer Versus Resilon/RealSeal and Gutta Percha/AH plus Sealers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About