2016
DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20163559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacteriological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility in surgical site infection in elective abdominal surgeries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 29 Inefficacy of penicillin in S. aureus isolates has been reported in previous studies as well. 23 However, S. aureus isolates from this study did not show any resistance toward linezolid, vancomycin, and teicoplanin. This corroborates with other studies as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 29 Inefficacy of penicillin in S. aureus isolates has been reported in previous studies as well. 23 However, S. aureus isolates from this study did not show any resistance toward linezolid, vancomycin, and teicoplanin. This corroborates with other studies as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…As against a previous study, diabetes mellitus was not associated with SSIs. 12,13,21 The predominance of gram-negative organisms, specifically E. coli, in the development of SSIs in the patient with abdominal surgeries has already been reported in many studies, [22][23][24][25][26] although few other studies have observed K. pneumoniae as the commonest gram-negative bacteria from the SSIs. 27 All the S. aureus isolates were found to be resistant to ampicillin, penicillin, and methicillin (MRSA), and a few were found (12.5%) susceptible to amoxycillin-clavulanate combination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%