2016
DOI: 10.1111/ans.13630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacteriological study in perianal abscess is not useful and not cost‐effective

Abstract: Bacteriological culture in perianal abscess is not useful for predicting the development of anal fistula or abscess recurrence. Hence, there is no need to perform this investigation on a routine basis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, pathogen isolation from the perianal area was not done in any of the patients. Although Xu et al [21] suggest that bacteriological study of perianal abscesses may be not useful or cost-effective, more effort should be put into isolating pathogens from either the blood or perianal area in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, pathogen isolation from the perianal area was not done in any of the patients. Although Xu et al [21] suggest that bacteriological study of perianal abscesses may be not useful or cost-effective, more effort should be put into isolating pathogens from either the blood or perianal area in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some studies suggest that the intestinal flora is not related to the occurrence of perianal abscess recurrence and anal fistula; thus, it is not necessary to cultivate it. 29 However, based on the results of existing pus cultures, antibiotics currently used mainly include β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors and nitroimidazoles. 9,16,22 The use of antibiotics without basis is likely to cause the production of drug-resistant bacteria, such as K. pneumoniae with high resistance to ampicillin and furantoin.…”
Section: Treatment Conservative Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 However, a recent case series of 164 patients found no statistically significant association between the presence of gut-derived organisms and the development of a fistula (odds ratio 0.48 (95% confidence interval 0.17 to 1.37)) or recurrence of perianal abscess (odds ratio 1.66 (0.46 to 6.01)). 19 Furthermore, a multicentre, double-blinded randomised trial showed that antibiotic treatment after abscess drainage offered no protection against subsequent fistula formation.…”
Section: Abscess or Fistula?mentioning
confidence: 99%