1985
DOI: 10.4319/lo.1985.30.1.0198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterivory by microheterotrophic flagellates in seawater samples

Abstract: Changes in the population sizes of bacteria and of heterotrophic microflagellates in seawater during the first 30–60 h after sampling indicate that these protozoa control bacterial numbers in situ. The observations allow crude estimates of in situ grazing rates and of the minimum bacterial concentration which sustains protozoan growth. In the water samples studied, an average flagellate will clear 1–2 × 10−5 ml h−1 (15°C). If this result is extrapolated to other areas, typical concentrations of microflagellate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
71
1
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
11
71
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It must then be assumed that losses of bacterial biomass were negligible during this phase. Two factors able to reduce the bacterial biomass in marine waters are grazing by nano-and microzooplankton (Andersen & Fenchel 1985, Van Duyl et al 1990) and lysis induced by viruses (Proctor & Fuhrman 1990, Heldal & Bratbak 1991. In degradation experiments with marine phyto- also be assumed that viral attack of bacteria is relatively low in an exponentially growing population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must then be assumed that losses of bacterial biomass were negligible during this phase. Two factors able to reduce the bacterial biomass in marine waters are grazing by nano-and microzooplankton (Andersen & Fenchel 1985, Van Duyl et al 1990) and lysis induced by viruses (Proctor & Fuhrman 1990, Heldal & Bratbak 1991. In degradation experiments with marine phyto- also be assumed that viral attack of bacteria is relatively low in an exponentially growing population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is three times the ratio found in an epipelagic reference data set, 1760 ± 162 (averaged data from the following papers: Kirchman et al, 1989;Cho et al, 2000;Tanaka and Rassoulzadegan, 2002;Yamaguchi et al, 2002Yamaguchi et al, , 2004Tanaka et al, 2005), indicating less protists for a given prokaryote cell in deep waters than at surface. A putative reason for the higher PROK:HP ratio in deep waters would be that the prokaryote abundance in the deep ocean is below the numerical threshold of grazing (Andersen and Fenchel, 1985), thus protists spend a lot of energy (via respiration) in the search for prey and as a result prokaryotes are inefficiently grazed. Alternatively, HP cells could be sustained at low prokaryotic abundances given the micropatch distribution theory (Simon et al, 2002;Baltar et al, 2009) that suggests that most of the interactions between HP and prokaryotes take place in large or small aggregates where prey density is high enough to sustain HP growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 and 4c; Table 2). Such curves have been reported from laboratory experiments or experimental enclosures over short incubations (Andersen and Fenchel 1985). Weisse (1990) showed, however, that such inverse relationships between HNF and bacteria may persist longer (weeks or months), not only in experimental systems…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%