2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2021.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bailout From Sinus Jailing

Abstract: Redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may pose the risk of coronary flow obstruction. We report 2 cases of severe TAVR regurgitation due to different physiopathological mechanisms in which TAVR-in-TAVR could be at high risk for sinus sequestration. Both cases were successfully treated by in-series implantation of a second transcatheter heart valve, thus avoiding sinus sequestration. ( Level of Difficulty: Intermediate. )

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, several other factors may come into play in causing bailout TAVI-in-TAVI, such as anatomic features, operator's experience, predilation, device choice, and postdilation. Accordingly, the debate can currently be epitomized as lower equals more pacemakers, and upper equals more TAVI-in-TAVI [14]. Our findings may inform decision-makers by confirming prior reports and smaller series, that operators wishing to minimize the risk of bailout TAVI-in-TAVI should pay particular attention to old patients, those with smaller body mass index, more calcific valves, larger valvular or aortic diameters, and when considering the use of self-expandable devices, in particular some of them [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of course, several other factors may come into play in causing bailout TAVI-in-TAVI, such as anatomic features, operator's experience, predilation, device choice, and postdilation. Accordingly, the debate can currently be epitomized as lower equals more pacemakers, and upper equals more TAVI-in-TAVI [14]. Our findings may inform decision-makers by confirming prior reports and smaller series, that operators wishing to minimize the risk of bailout TAVI-in-TAVI should pay particular attention to old patients, those with smaller body mass index, more calcific valves, larger valvular or aortic diameters, and when considering the use of self-expandable devices, in particular some of them [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, several other factors may come into play in causing bailout TAVI-in-TAVI, such as anatomic features, operator’s experience, predilation, device choice, and postdilation. Accordingly, the debate can currently be epitomized as lower equals more pacemakers, and upper equals more bailout TAVI-in-TAVI [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) A slightly deeper implantation, to reduce leaflets eversion although it may increase the risk of conduction disturbances. 35 4) Coronary protection thorough the chimney technique, as described previously. We suggest performing this technique in anatomies with highest risk of occlusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few reports of ACURATE neo THV degeneration and its management with a balloon expandable THV. 3 , 4 Mostly, a smaller THV is chosen, because nitinol frame allows enlargement. This could raise questions about final gradient, as there is a maximum diameter limitation and concerns regarding predictability of valve-to-coronary or valve-to-STJ distances, when post dilatation is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%