2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3208238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bailout Stigma

Abstract: We develop a model of bailout stigma where accepting a bailout signals a firm's balance-sheet weakness and worsens its funding prospect. To avoid stigma, a firm with high-quality legacy assets either withdraws from subsequent financing after receiving a bailout or refuses a bailout altogether to send a favorable signal. The former leads to a short-lived stimulation with subsequent market freeze even worse than if there were no bailout. The latter revives the funding market, albeit with delay, to the level achi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical evidence of stigma associated with backstop facilities like the DW has been provided by Peristiani (1998), Furfine (2001), Armantier et al (2015, Anbil (2018), Vossmeyer (2019), Anbil and Vossmeyer (2019), Beyhaghi and Gerlach (2023), and Armantier and Cipriani (2024). Formal models of emergency lending with stigma have been proposed by Ennis and Weinberg (2013), La'O (2014), Ennis (2019), Gorton and Ordonez (2020), Hu andZhang (2023), andChe et al (2023). To the best of our knowledge, A&H and the present paper are the only studies that focus on anti-stigma policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Empirical evidence of stigma associated with backstop facilities like the DW has been provided by Peristiani (1998), Furfine (2001), Armantier et al (2015, Anbil (2018), Vossmeyer (2019), Anbil and Vossmeyer (2019), Beyhaghi and Gerlach (2023), and Armantier and Cipriani (2024). Formal models of emergency lending with stigma have been proposed by Ennis and Weinberg (2013), La'O (2014), Ennis (2019), Gorton and Ordonez (2020), Hu andZhang (2023), andChe et al (2023). To the best of our knowledge, A&H and the present paper are the only studies that focus on anti-stigma policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This is the main difference with the model here, where only total income of the firm is observable; that is, “the return of old and new projects are fungible” (Philippon and Skreta , p. 3). Che, Choe, and Rhee () extend the model in Tirole () to allow for several rounds of play and study stigma when the government intervention takes the form of an asset‐purchases program.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others find government bailouts can intensify moral hazard and increase systemic risk (Del Viva et al, 2021; Diamond & Rajan, 2008; Fratianni & Marchionne, 2013). Further, Che et al (2022) argue that accepting a bailout signals a firm's balance‐sheet weakness and worsens its funding prospects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%